Laserfiche WebLink
y , <br />! Fr <br />j <br />? <br />PLANNIPIG COl-mfIsszoN - <br />April 89 1969 <br />I. Roll Ca13. . <br />The meeting was called to order at 8d02 P,Mo by Chair:man Jack Esgaro <br />Those presetat i-rero Mssrs, Jack Esgar9 Donald Ledvinag Richard Nel.son9 <br />Thomas Fabek9 Edward Byers9 Kurt F.ZCharels9 , 3ames Leonardo 4lso presento <br />' Ce.rl BoYun9 Regional Plannirg Comnissian9 Mi1ce Karhasa. Actino City 'EnginPer; . <br />J. Br°uce Kitclaen9 Law Director9 Sa11y Henk1e9 Secretargra ' <br />II. Reading and Correction of Minutes <br />By request of a nember of the audienee9 ?11o follpiaing addition to the minute 1 <br />of 3/25/69 was madQo Undez ITIo (a.) after attract botter types of businesse <br />add f°and upgrade the appearance of Lorain RoadaH9 Mro Leonard ;noved to dis e <br />w3:th the reading of the ninutes af 3/25/69 . and to a.pprove as eorrected o Mt <br />Fabek seconded the <br />III. Old Business <br />motiono IInanimously passedo <br />Mre Esgar pointed out that a rxling had <br />that the C3ty &W have a right fi,o rezon <br />Plaxining Cordmission wou3.d take action on <br />3.Iong Lorain Road and that f'urthur-?.ore9. <br />consider comments made by members of the <br />stated that the3r kave resturlied aer-?al <br />Lorai.n Raad arid restudied land use s?zgge <br />presentea anc? auestions or cor:iments abou <br />Tl?e PZanx?ing Cmnni.ssior? will t??en take <br />: <br />bee?? made by tlie City L?.?a Dzrector . <br />o Lorain Poado He an,?ous?cec1 tha?t th <br />th?'ee specific? requests foP rezonirb'? ? <br />the Co?ssion members had met to <br />audience at tho 3/25,?69 meetinga <br />maps ?.d ?iat1 driven al.ong tiae Iength <br />stiom.so A reviced plan. w?-11 be. .,?.? <br />-? x°e-?r2sions ?!ay be made at.tl?at ti;ne, <br />ac•tiQn on the revIsed plario <br />(a) ?ro?k?ark Fx?ension ? Nfr, Leonard stt?.ted that it was the opinion of the <br />m?.jori?? of the comm.ittee that iche plan wa.S accePtable as amendedo Mr,, <br />R3chards raoved to reeommend to Counei3 tlat tlae proposal be accepted as f. <br />amcndedo Mro--Byers seconded the rotioMo Ayes° Esgar9 Ledvina9 Nelso <br />Fabek9 Byers9 &3.chards, Noe. Leorsardo , The motion passed by a vote o£ <br />to 1. <br />(b) 2aremba Apart??x?t R?zonin? m Mro Byers announced that the traff'i.e flow <br />study made bgP Wiao T. Jaclman9 Traffic E?igineeriug Gonsultant9 wa.s complete <br />and that in brief thrc;e recommendations. had been nad.Qo (I) A traffic <br />ac luuated signal to be instalJ.ed at eoxner of jda.Iter Road and Lorain Roado <br />(2) Other traff'ic 23.ghts along Lorain Rea.d be interconnected for bettPr <br />f'I.oi$ ef traffica (3) A 1eft tui-n lane for trafflc exiting off Walter <br />Road onte Lora.in Road be. ins-talledo Mro Kmr*abinus comented on data ? <br />con-?a?ed in the report and st?.ted tI7ai? he f°6e1.s the repor-? 3s f4.irthlxr <br />e?ri.dence t?iaa.t tl?e are?. in c}?xestion vrs.ll no?C hanclle an apart.?en-? co?nple <br />He asked about the dr3inage survey tha?,,- was to have been made o??'r o Ka 'a? <br />stated tha.t he has-forvaa.rded t1?e repor?; of ZarembaB s drainage engineer o <br />?'7.oyd Browne and laopes ?,o h?.ve ttn ansS-rex' in t?iis regaxscl by the time of 'ch! <br />next meotinga Mro B,yors poinicecl out that in regards to the traffic9 a <br />great bulk of the traffic f°low WoulcZ be over a small area only of Yalter