|
.. • x
<br />CITY O]F' NOItT'Ii OliMS`T'LI39 OHIO
<br />PLANNING COMMISS7CdN
<br />5uly 229 1969
<br />t? RoY1L Cml1!.
<br />fihe meetirag was calYe? ?? order at 8s07 P,M,.by. Chairman..Ja.?.k._Es.gar.,?.. ?hose present
<br />were ?''i~?srs.. Jack Esgar9 Edr?ard Byeses9 Kurt. Ric;ftarets9 Bonald_.LeeYvina,eThomas Fabeleo
<br />Absent: Ri.chard NEl?on9 ????? ???narda Mr..Led?ina.,??vedt ,ieo. :excuse._ ti?e absence oi
<br />Mro NeYson arcd Mr-, Leonard:. .M,e. ggrers seconded. the:.mot-ion, ...iTnan??ously pasvecY.
<br />Also present:. Carl B?hm9 RegionaY P1anning: ?????sion; Mike Karhan, Acting City
<br />Engineer9 Sa7Cly Henk5Le9 ?ecrercaryo
<br />IIo 1?eadlin? and Corgection of 1?inutes
<br />The. foYYowing change-was macYe in..the ffiix????? of 7/8/69.a -. ?tirting on. lime- 49 - page 2:
<br />Yo.2 miles of ..t]?e Iine wouYd be.. adj a?enic::to the ,.exist ing._tgansmis sion: line for. which
<br />.ara additia-raaY :50` of r ighie-of-way qrossld be. ,eequired:, For.:.the 0.,1..miles nat adjacenie
<br />to existing Yines9 110' of ??ght-of-way wo-uld bE. requi?.Fedo AYr,. Byers.ffioved1 ieo dis_
<br />pAr.se wi?? the reading-of the. ffiinautes. of 7/8y69.andl ?o ag?p-rove as correctedo IKr.
<br />`Ledvina secbnded1 the motioaao UnanimousY.? passedo
<br />IIIo OYd Business.-
<br />(a) . S? D. C? Tnco Subdivision Mr0 _ By?-_:ps_ 5?ated .t,laaf_ar.letir.er..bacY., been received
<br />fgom.As..dexasion.Luatheran Church_ to:the eff&ct_ ehatthev:_would?..accegt the 40' of.
<br />. land . a? ?ffered.:by. the d??elopero.. : The. xaew..g????mi?ary;;,p1.an showing tYais.was
<br />- presente.d and.it: r??? expYained that the gsrobleffis .c3te.rY?at:_TLast. month e s _ r8eeting -
<br />. had beerc. ???olved1. The.Yots wi1l. alY meefi. or be -in--excess_. cf. ?he.. size required,
<br />R?gardsr?g tYne. 6d` reserve sicrip. on?? ?oufihera,..?'ir....Howaar.d_ BattY,er. (owcaer) was
<br />?ontactedl and is s.n.f avor .ofr Tetting-.the: street, go.::througb;.e... The. developer
<br />wouYd gsay tehE. cmmplete cost for. all._improveffientsa--']°m.,regardv._.to._rche. storm sewer
<br />, ..._. ._. situation9 Mro .T?arhaia..,eeported that there..agpears;-to -be.'an-add:i??ona1 IO%
<br />??pacity. oveg what.,WouY.d.be ,eequire.d.? Th.e .???s3-bils-ty...:cf.reserving. Yots. fore
<br />acYditional streeie openings was __suggested_ and ..th.e_.".veYopese,-staicecY.. that they
<br />?.. e?ould be.wiYls.ng:to go aY.ong _witb..the _Planning- CoBmrcL'Lss3onPs- re?ommendationsa
<br />. .. . .. ,._ :: Tt was eYetermn.ned..that.theree-shoanld.:be., two_.?treet.._cpenizsg.s_not.._mmre.tYnan.Y300o
<br />. . . _ . . . ?.g??rc o In ord?er._ tapetmit a????vaY_ of:_iehe .new-?lan,-. it. was_.decided that new
<br />drawings should be prEsenteel showixag the.. reserved - 3Lots . axad .,ee?olv.ing the sizes
<br />on a5.7L Yots8 E1 special ineeting wilY be. heYd mn Tuesday 7/29{'63 for the prsrpose
<br />-
<br />... ot voting on the progosaYo. ...,.. - ..._._ ..._...._,.
<br />_(b). V?catg.oxa or i???th?? - Mr.,Byers stated..that.there:raigY bexno. report_on this
<br />matter uratiY the .S.o. D., C.;.SubdiRrisson proposal. is resoYved, ..
<br />..
<br />; =(C) - CEI Right-mf-Waq - Mr. :By?.rs stated.. th?.i?_the?co?tte?._.co?prised._..?.f..himse.lfs -
<br />Mr, Ledvina and M,en Leonared had met:.aznd that.they.are.._.in,_g?-ner?.Y,.agreement.that.
<br />aside rroffi the. ??the??cs.9. it is, a.nEcessary: evi:l: and-_.tla?.y._ can f ind n?th3ng eTse
<br />obj ?????nabYe0 1?'ir. Byers.. moved that CET ° s .. reqaaest_. far;: seiaht-of-?74y_ for Yine
<br />. . . . extension.be approved as..gresented at..ttae 7/8/f9.meetiaago ..Mr.-. Ledvina ???onded
<br />. . .. the motiono Ayes: . Esgar9 Fabek, By ers9 Ledvixaa0 1Vo. Richards, The motion
<br />passed I?y a_ 4. ?o I vote... . ., .. . .
<br />- . . . .. . . ... _ . ,
<br />(d). Bl??som Land1 Coo-Street Ope?ings. -..Mro DiBexaedettm..presexated...cYrawings.:of:the. . 7Lots ixn questson. TLt wa? exp1Lained, tt??t -what.:is _needed_ s?s- an amended.. sub.division
<br />engsneere"s..draeaing_.Of_Tot. showing_street openinga 1Kr. Esgar suggested.
<br />that ttais p,eoposai b? ???ed on at the speciaY me??ing to be hEid an 7J29/690
|