10/01/1969 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF NORTH OLi=ZSTED - BOARD OF ZONING APPEAI,S ?. ReguIar Meeting held a.t City Hall - October I, 1969 `"he meeting was called to order at 7:34 by Chairman John Roberts. Those Present; Mssrs. Roberts, Greene, Da.vis, Lancashire Also Presentr Mr0 Gundy, Buil.ding Cormnissioner The minutes of the 9/3/69 meeting were approved as written. 1. Appellant! North Olmsted Lunber Co., 27375 Lorain Road. Continuation of recsuest for srecial permit to build an add.ition onto exi.sting non-confornxr_g building. Addition wouZc be 201 frorn .front property line at closest point. Special perin.it requested a,s per Ordinance #62-33, Sectior_ I231.02 and I133.12. Present: Mr. Zahner A letter from Fra.nk Lorcl, Assistant Law Director was read. The letter reaffirmed the position of the Law Department that the f.ront setback was not paric of the yard requirements and that a special permit could be gra.ntecie Discussion was held in thiti regarci. It was pointed out that the proposed adc?ition would square of'f the front of the building ana that all parking in front -would be eliminateaa It was sta.ted that this area would be landscapec?. Mra Zahner state6 that he felt they would be im-oroving the safety fa:ctor as well as inproving on the appeaxa.nce of the propertym He pointed out that this was the only possible expansian space. It was decided that since the building sits on an angle and would be protruding furthur to-warcls the street than it does at present that a variance shoulcl also be grantea if a special permit is a.llowed. Mr. Greene moved to grG.n.t a special permit f'or al.teration of structure to provide - 201 setback from Lora.in Road at tize NII corner in Iine w-ith present front of building. No a.rking is to be cerm.itted in front and front area should be landscaped. Mr. Lancashire seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vv'te o£ 3 to 1 with Mr. Davis voting no. 2, Appellant: Dennis Schnell. Request to erect dwelling at 3919 CanterburT Road with a. 1001 setback. Fiequest is in violation of Orci.inance #62-33, Sec'uion 1159.0I which states that the maxizaun setback shall be 701. Present: Mr. and Mrs. Schne].I ?Rr. Schnell expIw.ined that there is a vacazlt lot on both sides of the Iot in ouestion. To the north, the next four hor.ies sit back 1161 froM the side-wralk. To the south, the next two sit back 709 and from that point move furthur back. They wish to sit back 100' which would be in between the two extremes.m The area is heaviZy wooded a.nd the difference wouZd not be noticeable. Board men-bers questioneci the.effec-t this would ha.ve of persons building on the two vacant lots adjacent. . Mro and. Mrs. Schnell stated that they would be willing to move up to'901if this would better the situation. Mr. Lancashire moved to grant a 201 variance to build 901 back from the street. 14r. Davis seconded the motiono Unanirnously passed. 3. Appellant: Geor.ge Garber, 27187 Gloucester Drive. Request to i.nstall a 161 redwood windbreak 61 high at prvperty line adjacent to ratio. Request is in vioTation _ to Ordinance ,"62-33, Section 1151.04, f'ence not to erceed 4t in height. Present: Mr. Garber mr, Garber ,r,resented a pnotograpll showing how eytremely eighborts patio an.cl swimming pool. Neither hr:.ve any p: neigrbor involved, has no objection. i4r. Garber stated fence closer to the ratia because he hopes to screen it gas barbec±ue situated t}iere. Mr. Greene moved to gran-t two 81 sections of 6' rec?wood fence on side lot line to NIr. Davi.s secar_ded the motion. Unanimously passed. close his pativ is to the next door rivacy whatsoever. Mrs. Bosley, the that he does n.ot wish to move t}ie in in the future. There is also a a 2' varisnce in lzeight to permit extend from rear of home bacY 161.