Laserfiche WebLink
CTTY OF 1FORTH 0UISTED -BOARD OF ZOn1ING aPPEALS <br />Regu? ar Meetirsg held_ a.t City Ha,ll - November 4, I970 <br />The meeting was cal.led -to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairm.an jdilliam Gr-eene. <br />Those present: Mssrs. Williom Greene, John Poberts, 17illian. Tubba, Mrs. Eian (Iate) <br />Also present: Mr. Gundy, BuiZding Co_mmissioner <br />k <br />The minutes o'L the I0/22/70 meeting tiTere a?-oroved as written. <br />1. AnpelZant: itenneth G. Jones, 6030 Porter Road - Continuation of request.to erect <br />71' fence aIong rear lot 1? ne and 61 fence a.long 40' of north lot Iine <br />and l;.Ot of riorthea.st section of rear yard.. Request is in violation of <br />Orc'inance ;#62-33, Section I151.01+, fence not to exceed 41 in height. <br />Present: Mr. Jones <br />? <br />Mr. Greene Expla.ined that this case had been continued for the -purraose of Baprd rsembers <br />inspecting the property in ?uPstion. It was ?ointed out that the elevation of the house <br />to the rear of Mr. Jones was conaiclerably hs.gher. It was ¢Iso stated thd.t the garage <br />obecurez the view of the fence to the neighbor of the south side who tirote aletter of <br />objection, Mx. J'ones -,,itharew his rea.uest for--the 6' fence ?long north Iot Iine and <br />northea4t [•ection.of the rear yarr3 and stv.ted that he just rvm.nted the 7;-,P f'ence along the <br />rear and ht doTm the north side which has ealreadSr been erected. Discusui-on was hela. <br />t°Ir. Tubbs moved to ap;arove i*ariance for exis+ing fence acTobs 401 at rear and 61 on north <br />side of lot; secondea by Mr. R.aberts and unanimously pa,ssed. <br />2. ?ppellant: Cedar Point Supere+te, 5600 Columbia Ron.d - Cont??r_tlution of request ior <br />extension of .non-confos-raing use and to erect secor.d pole sign. Request <br />is in violation of Ordinance ,,?'62-33, %Section 1225.02 anci Section 1211.03. <br />Present: Mr. Macezko <br />It 'r13.S expla.ined that this ca.ee w-as continued so tlaat Mr. Macezko cou?d contact Fleetwing <br />to see ii 'nis sign could be combinetl with theixs on the singlepole a.lreadv.located on <br />'Uhe proverty. Mr. Macezko stated that F1eEtw-ing would not permit thi4 and that he was <br />unable to work out anything with them. He furthur -stated that his neighbors hFVe no <br />objections. Ke painted out that hiw store i4 loeated on a. curve and that its location <br />hinders visib? lity o.l' the store. DiscuQsion was held a.na the f a,et tha.t this is a non- <br />confox:ming use in a resic.ential district was brought out. N1r. Tubbs movecl to denir the <br />var3.2nce request, secanded by Mr. Roberts and uaused with i4r. Greene voting no. <br />3. ADpellant: CharleG Bolognia - Cort,inuation of xequest to erect dwe?ling on Permanent <br />Parcel #235-14-91 Decker. P.aad vith insufficient sidelines 124 square feet <br />smaller in first floor living area than ree,uirec by Ordina:nce. Rec,uest <br />is in vial?tion o-F' Ordinance #62-33, Section 1161.01 requiring that the <br />sum of the two Uides be not Iess than 201 anc7_ Section 1153.02 vhich <br />determines minimuin livable floor area. <br />?resent: Mr. Bo? ognia, hfr, and Mrs. Ga.lvin <br />Mre Bolognia e?Ia.inec? th-t it woUld be ?. fir_ancia.l hardshin for his to ada the 71 to <br />the home that would bring it un to aize reauirements. He a1so poirited out that a larger <br />house wou1d decrease the turning ra.:dius inta -the gara.ge and create a har.dship in that ?,ay. <br />He stated that Mr. Cassano, next door to the lot in?ruestion, has no objections to.his <br />requesto Mr. and Mrs. Galvin, owr_ers of t-vo 401 lots ir_ the area, sta,ted that they did <br />not feel a, houGe ehould be built on a 1,01 lot ancl that the o'Llher ho?nes in the area were <br />very nice-ho!nes. Discus[ion w-a.s helci. Mr.. Robarts movec? to c'+.eny the, varia.nce recuest; <br />seconded bv Mr. Tubbs and unanimo7asly passed.