Laserfiche WebLink
, CIT?.' OF NORTH OLMSTED - BOARL OF ZONING !-2I'E•ALS <br />Regule.r Meeting held at City HalI --- JuIy Z,, 1970 <br />The meetin{; was called to arder at 7:48 P.M. bY' Chazrman WiZliam Greene. <br />Those nresent: Mrs. Eian, Mssrs. 1JiLiam Greene, Ernest Green, Lancashire (Zate) <br />Also -oresent: Mre Gundy, Building Commissioner <br />The rainutes of the 6/3/70 meeting 'Fere approved as ZaritteMo <br />I„ A?*-eZlant: Peter N. Clarke, 5794 Bradley Road. Request to ereet 601 of b' redi-rood <br />fence along lot line adjacent to natio area. Recuest is in violation of <br />Ordin?,nce 02-33, Section 1151.04, fence not to er>ceed 4' in height. <br />Prssents P-lir. Clarke, Mr. Fceynolds <br />i4r. Clwrke expla.ined that his house sits close to the rea,r lvt 2ine on a,n irregular <br />sha.ned lot and is extreMely close to his neighboris garage and house. His Datio is <br />elevated about 2' tfhich raeans that a/?1 fence wouTd be of no ;*a.I.ue. There is a stand <br />of maoIe,trees at the rear and no shrubs or grass wi.21 grow there. Pdr. Reynolds' the <br />neighbor..most directl.y invoZved' stated thzt he hav no objections. Mr. Ernest Green <br />moved to grant a variance for 601 of 61 redi-+ood fence along lot line adjacent to patio <br />area.; seconded by Mrs. Eian and unan3_mously passeda <br />2. Appellant: David Hinckley, 24301 North Oxford Oval. Request to enclose existing <br />Pa.tio 451 from rear Zot Iine. Reauest is in violation oi" Ordinance # <br />62-33, Sec•tion 1163.01 whi.eh requires a 501 rear yard, . <br />Present: Mr. Hinckley <br />Mr. HinckTey ex' pIained that when his house was buiZt in 1964, he ha.d footers put under <br />the oatio for the er_press purpose af bualding a porch in the future. Hovrerrer, he Iacks <br />51 in distance frorn the rear lot Iine. He Frishes to screen i.n the e_?sting patia and <br />his neighbors have no obj ec+iona '?..o the rF,r,uest. It N-.s pointeci out ihat it would be <br />strictZy a screened rorch and nat a year round room additiore Mrs. Fian moved to grant <br />a 5+ rear yard variance to percait enc?osing existing patio; seconded b3* Mro Frnest Green <br />and unanimously passed. <br />3. Appel.Iant: Edward Musback, 24920 DeerfieZd Drive. Eecuest to erect detached gara.ge <br />1418p? from adjacent ci?vre?].ingo Reques't is in vio2ation of Orainance #62-33s <br />Section 1I51.04 Which reauires ami.n?r,ium of 20' between aeta.ched garage <br />and any dweZl3nga <br />Present: Niro Musback <br />Mr. Muaback exnIained that the house next door is L-shaped -wnth a.n attachea garage to the <br />fronto Tt sits back furthur on tM.e Iat in order ta na,intain a 50" setbaclc. This reean.s <br />that his prafnosed detached garage wou].d be 14' 8" from the adj acent dwelling. If h.e were <br />to move it.over, he could nat make the ss,-i.ng into tlie garage. The neighbor has no <br />objection ta his proposaT. Mrs oEian nmred to grant a5e 4" variance to erect detachecT <br />gara.ge 141811 frorri ad.jacent c1welling; seconcied by Mr. F.rnest Green and unanninously passed. <br />4? Ap.pellant: Shersain -Vil].iams Compang, 27254 Lora3n Foad. Request to instal2 an $t <br />cliain-link fence with a lt barbed wire top to enclose rear portion af <br />vrorserty. Fteouest is in vioTwtion of Ordinance #62-33., Sec+ion 1151.04 (H) <br />whicr prohibits instaTlati.on of barbed wire fence. <br />Preser_te Mr. Sz,-anson