02/04/1970 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r' CI'1_'Y OF P1ORTH OLMSTFD -- BO?!F.D OF ZONIAtCx fi.PPFn.LS . ,. Regular MePting held at City Iiall - February 4, 1970 T].?e meeting vras call.ed to order at 7:30 P.M. ?.l Cnairma.n Willimna Greene. T'ciose Present: Mrse Eian9 A'zssrs. Greene, Roberts, Lancashire \ Also PresPnt: Mr. Gundy, Buildlrg Com-missioner 1. ADnellant: Carriage CarDet Go., 27715 LQraln Poad. Con.tinuatior of reque5t to . ereet arldi.tioxial 10' X 51 sign. Request is in violation of Ordinance #62-33, Section 1225.02 -,,'hich aets maximum square footaQe of signs pexmit,ted. Presen-t: George Larsen reprPsentirlg Carriage Carpet Co,, Mrs. Kova.cic (wife of owraer) It was determined tha,t V2e entire buildir-g '_kiousing Carriage Caroet Co. is presently + 35 squaxe .f.eet over the pexriitted area, (1ther businesses in the building liave :?ore sig? ?.rea th?. Carriage Carpet Co. I?r. I;?.rsen e?I?.i?.ed't???.t due to t,he a?gle of th? builc3ing, customers Aave trouble loca.ting their business. They wish to erect a sign that woule3 simpZy be a picture of a carri-age in black on ?. wr?ite b?,ckgrou?id. ancl wY3ich would be mounted flush Roainst the building. It.wouid be spotligl?ted but krould not itself be illuminated. Board mer,ibers asked if the present S'3e.ller sign 7ortrayina the Same carriage i-Tould be removecl Pnd Mrs. Kovacic stated t-hat she wa.s sure that her HuGba,xid intexic3ed leaving it up. The general cor-cersus of opinion was that puttimg up a.n additional sigii without taking do?-n the other siot2 would cr. Pate a cluttered look. '?Krs. Kovacic stated. that they will,submit a.rz alterza.te p1aaz. Mr. Poberts l-,ioved to contz.nue the ca.se to t'ne rext i-ieeti?ag; seconded by Mr. Lancashire and unanimousl.y passed. 2. Aprellant: Ba,uer DeveTopmemt Co. Fenuest co erect house at 5811 gevEre Drive z-rith a /,0?ear yard. Recsuest is in violation Qf Ordii2ancP 1162-33, Section, 1163.01 which r•eruires a 50' rear yarc?. Present: P-tr. Bauer, Mr. Oring' Mr, and Mrs. Demerling, Mr. Freeh Mr. BaUPx e)?nlained that tiiP lo.t i?:? r;ue:tion is narrower ixi the back than in the front arad in order to meet the sctuare footage rec?uirements, a41, rear yard va-riance is requested. Pl.P-ns were nresentecl_ for a colo-iliaI style 'tiouse val.ued at $36,900. Mr. aring cited_ the several variancss that ha.d heeii recuested by iMr. Bauer im the, past and asked wtily Iots . were ? aid oiat that woul.a require variances. It -was eapIainec?.- that the Zoring Board has ii-othing to do tiait"h this. .Mr. and Mrs. Demer.ling stated that tIaey didxa.t t feel that the ?3ouse cor?pared va1ue-tirire witi-i others in tlle neighborhood. They auggested addii-ig acditionaI bec?roorns in order fo u-pgrade the nouse. Mr. Greene pointed out trLat the bigger the house, the r:iore variance would be requirer. Mr. Bauer pointed that the house prorosed. for tl-ie Iot would sell for 936,900. Six3ce it was felt that thi,s was a harc3s'nip -an_;_tl?.at tane Iot slaouZd be built on, Mr. Roberts moved to ?;r?.zit a 1?1 v?.riance. Mr. ya?? c? shir. e seconc?ed f.z3e motion. Unanimously passed. 3. Ap-nell.ant: Fobei t McGreaI, 23583 Marion Road. Reauest for variance on existing patio awning installed to t,he side 1ot Iine. Rec{uest is in violation . of Ordi?iance ;!'h2-33, 5ection 1161.0I sakich requires a 5t minimun side • yard. Present: Mr. and Ntrs. McGreal. ,qr? pn,d Mrs, vtcGrea,I expIained tnat the awming in question is made of corrugated aliani3un? and extends to a?"ence l;l fror?. the 1Qt 1i??e. Tt ?*?.s extended over to o.ff.er Dixag Trri.Zlow tr. ee in the yard protectiora to ?. rocl? garcle?:?. beizent?i ite T}a.ere is a we?-