|
'IT`:' 01{ NOFTH OL;i``TED, OHIO
<br />iL?1J?i Il'G C0?ION
<br />June 8y 1';71
<br />I. Roll Ca11
<br />The meeting i, s called t,o or.r.',.-r at 8a10 '•',:'i, bsT Ch2ir_,?an Donalc Ledvin?„
<br />T'?.oce nresent ;rere i?.s..rse L,eevina, TcT-.,.-rd. B;Ters9 'rurt Rich?.rds, J:,_rnes
<br />L(--;OriPxC+., Abpento J-,:nes ]7=.vis9 J. Zc?.?*?'.rd Bret•rer9 Riehard. ATElson, A1so
<br />rresento 'n"r. Rar_cbury, n ssistant to Acting Cit.J Engineer, GundRr,
<br />Buila.ing Co.!:Lnissior_erg Sa11-r Henlrle9 Secretary, ',ir, I,eonard ;noved to
<br />ea.cuse Nt;ir. A^.vis; secondec;. 'o;r Kr, Richp-res and unan?^?o?.?sly LL:,assedo
<br />II o Re^.ding and Correction oi Minutes
<br />The minute? of the 51W71 _neeting zr*ere ?.1Dpraved as written,
<br />III. Building De-?artment RerUe=ts
<br />(a) 7-11 Store - North Qf Sunoco St^tion -.t corner of Clugue a.nd Lorain,
<br />?4x, Gun07 e-7..-;1,>ined that the p1an sho?-s the number oi z:).•.rki-ng spaces
<br />rec?uired. 'osr ordin.?nce ^.nd thnt nlantino stri» i[ incluc?ec?. He pointed
<br />out a technic,.l violation on n.rivew: y r.dius. Discussion im.s lleld
<br />reg^.?,ciino rjrecious tr^.f--T'ic surve;;r inade in this area and the density
<br />of trarfic was pointed out. It was felt that an even worse situation
<br />tirould be cre -ted bv 2 store of this type in this loca.tiono Mr,
<br />Leonard :noved to reject the proposal on the basis of poor ,?lanning;
<br />seeonc'ed 'ay i?-ir, Byers and unanLnouslzl passed.
<br />IVe Old Business
<br />(a) Nen Roc Rezonina Reruest - A?o representative pregent and no neT•r -roi,osal,
<br />V. New Develop-.r,ients and Subdivisions - ATone
<br />vI, Communications
<br />(a) Letter fro?n L;F.i,r Director rea Service Euilding Site
<br />VII, Committee Rerorts
<br />(a) Public Hou-?Hr, Ledvina reported -that he ?net with a group at St.
<br />Brenda.nt s on 6/2/71. He has had no additional nata irom the developer
<br />reo elderly a.rartment complex.
<br />(b) Temr,or2r5r uigns - No report
<br />VIII, P?ew Business
<br />2x,
<br />It was detei-minEd that that there s•rould not be a c!uorum present if a meeting
<br />T?*ere to be he].d on the next xegul.2r meeting night Qf 6/22/71. ivir, Leon.ard
<br />inoved to dis-ense i•rith the nex-t meeting due to 1 ack af P. cuorum; seconded
<br />by Mr. BtTers and unanimousl,y n-.ssed.
<br />?.0j ourrunent - Mx, Leonard maved to ?,.dj ourn the meeting; seeon?Led by Mr,
<br />Richaxcis -nd_ un^nimousl7T i;r-.ssed, The meeting way.;<,djouxpea 1t,-9-;,00 P.M.
<br />Dona,ld. Ledvina,
<br />Edz-mard Dtrers;
|