Laserfiche WebLink
-V <br />BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 3, 2009 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Mrs. Diver called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm in Council Chambers. <br />Present: Maureen Diver, Nancy Sergi, Laura Bellido, Jennifer Rudolph, Alfredo Lopez <br />Staff: Assistant Law Director Bryan O'Malley, Assistant Building Commissioner Dale <br />Mitchell, Clerk of Commissions Donna Rote <br />REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES <br />Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Mr. Lopez, to approve the August 6, 2009 Board of <br />Zoning Appeals minutes which was unanimously, approved 5-0. <br />RESIDENTIAL APPEALS AND REQUESTS: <br />Ann Scullin; 4108 Brendon Lane: <br />Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of replacing existing sunroom and the <br />following variance is required: A 6 foot rear yard variance for residence to close to rear property <br />line; code requires 50' and 44' is shown which is in violation of section 1135.08(a). <br />Mr. David Young the Contractor and Mrs. Scullin the homeowner were sworn in. Mrs. Scullin <br />said that the existing sunroom was built in 1965, the roof has started to cave in, the sides are <br />pulling away from the house and the cement flooring is cracked and also pulling away from the <br />homes foundation. Mr. Young said the room was hazardous, non-functional and needed to be <br />replaced, the new room is 21 x 12 feet which will lend itself to being more functional. Mr. <br />Mitchell said the building department had no objections to the request as it would be a three <br />season room and only 3 feet larger than the original sunroom. Ms. Rudolph said the southern <br />side of the yard is fenced, the existing enclosure is in poor condition, the additional3 feet is not <br />substantial and the new sunroom would enhance the character of the neighborhood and allow the <br />owner to fully utilize the room. Mr. Lopez said he agreed with Ms. Rudolph but felt it could be <br />constructed to be the same size which would not require a variance. Mrs. Bellido said as the <br />home was being enhanced, the room will provide a bit of privacy to the owner and the character <br />of the neighborhood would not be affected so she did not object. Mrs. Sergi and Mrs. Diver <br />agreed the variance was not substantial and felt the spirit and intent of the zoning code would be <br />upheld granting the variance. <br />Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Mrs. Sergi, to grant Ann Scullin of 4108 Brendon Lane a <br />6 ft rear yard variance for residence to close to rear property line; code requires 50' & 44' <br />is shown which is in violation of section 1135.08(a) and was unanimously approved 5-0. <br />Ross & Susan Staffeld; 4638 Georgette Ave: <br />Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a shed and the following variance is <br />required; A 40 square foot variance for shed larger than code allows; code permits 120 sq ft and <br />160 sq ft is shown which is in violation of section 1135.02 (d)(1).