10/13/2010 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING & DESIGN COMMISSION CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 13, 2010 ROLL CALL Mr. Laslco called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers and led the Pledge of Allegiance. Present: John Laslco, Don Rerko, Ralph Bohlmann, Melissa Meredith, Robert Parry, Jim Cotner Absent: Greg Malone Staff: Planning Director Kimberly Wenger, Assistant Law Director Bryan O'Malley, City Engineer Pete DiFranco, Building Commissioner Dale Mitchell, Clerk of Commissions Donna Rote REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES Mr. Lasko moved, seconded by Mrs. Meredith, to approve the Planning and Design Commission minutes of September 22, 2010, which was approved 6-0 OLD BUSINESS Mr. Laslco said that although the Century Federal proposal was not on the doclcet, residents were present to address the commission. Mr. John Hill said he represented Mackenzie Road residents who would lilce to request the city require traffic and storm water survey. Mr. Laslco thanlced the residents for being present to submit the document and although the commission would accept the document it would not be discussed as the applicants were not present. NEW BUSINESS CMS10-32: Carol Ekstrand; 4562 Lansing Drive Proposal consists of a lot split and consolidation. A section of parcel B, PP# 232-02-002, which is 1.28 acres will be split off and consolidated with parcel A, PP# 232-02-057, which is 0.3306 acres. Newly created Parcel B, PP# 232-02-002, will be 0.89 acre and Parcel A, PP# 232-02- 057, will be 0.73 acre. Both parcels are zoned One Family Residence B and meet zoning code requirements. Ms. Wenger said parcel A fronts on Lansing Drive and parcel B fionts the Oring Road right-of- way, although the street has not been constructed. Parcel B is not land loclced as there is public access. However any future development of parcel B would require the property owner complete the right-of-way access. As the newly created lots meet all zoning code requirements, she recommended approval. Mr. DiFranco said although he had no objection to the request, a new mylar would be required showing the correct parcel numbers of both parcel A and B. Mr. O'Malley said that parcel B is not landlocked and it would be the burden of the property owner to develop the right-of-way, not the city.