Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING & DESIGN COMMISSION <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 27, 2010 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Mr. Lasko called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers and led the Pledge of <br />Allegiance, <br />Present: John Laslco Jr., Melissa Meredith, Ralph Bohlmann, Don Rerko, Greg Malone, Jim <br />Cotner (arrived at 7:10 pm) <br />Staff: Planning Director Kimberly Wenger, Assistant Law Director Bryan O'Malley, City <br />Engineer Pietro DiFranco, Building Commissioner Dale Mitchell, Clerk of <br />Commissions Donna Rote <br />REVIEW AIoTD CORRECTION OF MINUTES <br />Mr. Lasko moved, seconded by 1VIr.1Vlalone, to approve the January 13, 2010 aninutes <br />which was unanimously approved 5-0. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />CMS10-01: Fairview Office Park; PPN 237-23-023 <br />Representative: Don Lydon, Zaremba Management <br />Ms. Wenger said the proposal consists of modifications to previously approved landscape plans. <br />These landscape changes were denied as a minor change in 2009. The development consists of <br />buildings and site improvements in Fairview Park and landscaping and future parlcing in North <br />Olmsted. In 2000 the development was presented and there were extensive debates pertaining to <br />the site remaining in a natural state or if landscaping should be installed to create buffers and a <br />inore parlc lilce setting. The differences in opinion are evident, as the final approved landscape <br />plan which was a hybrid of mounding and new landscaping wrapping the corner of Clague and <br />Broolcpark Roads with the rest of the site left in a natural state. Since the approval and <br />construction, grading changes were made and some trees have died in the natural area. This has <br />prompted the applicant's proposed landscaping changes which include removing dead and other <br />existing trees and adding new plantings. The City Forester's report recommends the natural area <br />remain in its natural state, including the dead trees as they provide a habitat for wildlife. <br />However while she respects the forester's opinion, she also recognizes that there are other issues <br />to be considered. The changes to the area since construction have resulted in an uncoordinated <br />mix of improved versus unimproved green space that does not give the best appearance or <br />impression of the City. The dead trees and brush are not consistent with the high quality office <br />parlc development which it accompanies. She supports the preservation of significant mature <br />trees on the site and would expect any new proposed trees would be of substantial number and <br />size given the number of trees identified for removal. <br />Mr. Mitchell noted his respect for the forester, but comparing the site to neighboring <br />developments and considering the area is a gateway into the city he would prefer the site be