Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF BUILDING CODE APPEALS <br />CITY OF NORTH OLIVISTED <br />MINUTES OF MARCH 17, 2011 <br />ROLL CALL <br />The meeting was called to order at 5:31 p.m. in Council Chambers. <br />Present: Donna Sabo, Julianne Nader, Dan Jarachovic <br />Absent: Robert Lipcsey, BJ Meder <br />Staff: Planning and Development Director Kimberly Wenger, Planning and <br />Development Secretary Tricia Granfors <br />REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES <br />Mr. Jarachovic moved, seconded by Ms. Nader, to approve the Board of Building Code <br />Appeals minutes of December 16, 2010, which was approved 3-0. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />Alex & Linda Nieberding; 5974 Gareau I)rive: <br />Proposal consists of fence installation along a property line where a rear neighbor's fence already <br />exists; code does not permit, Section 1369.03(a)(3). Note: Neighbor's 6 ft. wood fence does not <br />border the entire property line and was erected under permit in 1997. <br />Property owner Linda Nieberding of 5974 Gareau Drive, Tom Tekesky of American Fence <br />Company, and neighbor Tom Eccleston of 5988 Gareau Drive were sworn in. Mr. Tekesky said <br />he worlcs with Solutions at Worlc (SAW), an extension of Cuyahoga County which partners with <br />the Board of Mental Retardation on behalf of residents with mental retardation and/or <br />developmental disabilities. Linda's adult son Alex is mentally disabled. The family was <br />awarded a grant for the fence installation to give Alex a safe, contained outdoor space. During <br />the application process they learned about the ordinance forbidding parallel fences and that a <br />variance would be required. The rear of the property is 70 feet wide; the request is to install a 4- <br />foot high chain linlc fence 3-4 inches from the rear property line so that the concrete footers are <br />within property boundaries. Behind the Nieberding property is a 12-foot wide drainage and CEI <br />easement. On the other side of this easement 5973 Stearns Road has an existing 6' wood fence. <br />The property owner would be responsible for maintaining the easement area; the property <br />containing the easement does not belong to Ms. Nieberding. Mr. Eccleston said he has no issues <br />or concerns with the fence installation. <br />Ms. Sabo noted Building Commissioner Mitchell recommended in his review that a 3-foot gate <br />should be installed for access to the easement area for maintenance. Ms. Nieberding accepts that <br />recommendation; Mr. Tekesky said the installation of a gate would pose no problem. Mr. <br />Jarachovic visited the site. He feels this case is similar to many variance requests the Board has <br />granted in the past.