My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/23/2011 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2011
>
2011 Planning and Design Commission
>
03/23/2011 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:40 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 8:00:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2011
Board Name
Planning & Design Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/23/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING & DESIGN COMMISSION <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MINUTES OF MARCH 23, 2011 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Mrs. Meredith called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers and led the Pledge <br />of Allegiance. <br />Present: Melissa Meredith, Greg Malone, Ralph Bohlmann, Don Rerko, Robert Parry, Mark <br />Mahoney <br />Staff: Planning and Development Director Kimberly Wenger, Assistant Law Director Bryan <br />O'Malley, City Engineer Pietro DiFranco, Clerk of Commissions Donria Rote <br />REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES <br />Mrs. Meredith moved, seconded by Mr. Bohlmann, to approve the Plannfng and Design <br />Commission minutes of March 9, 2011 which was approved 6-0. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />CMS10-35: Gyro George; 30791 I.orain Road <br />Representatives: Allen Kacenjar, attorney; George Glyptis, owner <br />Ms. Wenger said the applicant appeared before the Commission on January 26 to seelc approval <br />for paint colors used on the building after the fact. The Commission had a number of <br />recommendations and suggestions for improvements to the building and to alleviate property <br />maintenance violations. The applicant was asked to appear before the Commission with a plan <br />no later than March 23. Since the applicant's January appearance before the Commission <br />meeting, no contact had been made with staff regarding the project. The applicant's attorney has <br />requested a postponement of the matter for 60 days. <br />Mr. O'Malley recommended the commission allow the attorney the opportunity to be involved in <br />the matter. It is his hope that Mr. Kacenjar will lead his client into complying with property <br />maintenance issues and commission concerns. He encouraged the commission to consider <br />allowing a reasonable amount of time for the attorney to work with his client. Mr. Kacenjar said <br />he received the minutes of the last Planning & Design Commission meeting his client attended <br />and briefly viewed the site. His client is in the process of receiving quotes to replace the current <br />roof which is one of the issues. He is also working on removing the fencing or modifying it <br />some way to have a better visual impact. He would like to have the time to work with his client <br />to draft proper plans which include a site plan, landscape plan and other necessary plans. Mr. <br />Glyptis said that due to weather conditions he was unable to get companies out to give him <br />quotes. He aslced that the commission take that into consideration when allotting additional time. <br />Mr. Malone said that sixty days ago when the application first came before the commission the <br />commission was very clear as to what they would like to see and gave clear guidance as to what <br />was expected. He felt 30 days should be ample time tor the applicant to submit proper plans.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.