Laserfiche WebLink
J f <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFE1tENCE" <br />? LANDMARKS COMMISSION <br />I OLD TOWN HALL <br />MIleTUTES DECEMBER 3, 2001 <br />7:00 P.M. <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman Lord called the meeting to order at 7:15pm. <br />PRESENT: Chairman B. Lord, M. Davis, G. Corell, P. Barker, K. O'Rourke and L. VanAuken. <br />ABSENT: A. Smeraldi, C. Kasler, and D. Lind. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: <br />The Landmarks Commission minutes of the November 12, 2001 meeting have been submitted <br />for approval. <br />L. VanAuken noted a few minor spelling corrections and motioned to approve the minutes dated <br />November 12, 2001 with corrections. P. Barker seconded the motion and was unanimously <br />approved. <br />IIL NEW BUSINESS: <br />Mrs. Lord called Adam Pidcock forward. She indicated that he is thinking about buying a <br />property on Columbia Rd., which is owned by the Jones family. He had some questions about <br />plaques and how to apply for them. She let him know that there were the two different types of <br />plaques and how to get them. He also wondered about the benefits of doing this. She told him <br />that it is more of a personal kind of benefit. It may help when he goes to sell the home. He <br />asked about tax advantages and she explained that the City has no ordinance that relates to that. <br />However, there are on occasion tax advantages if that is in a budget bill. Often times those tax <br />advantages are for businesses or for enterprise sounds. Don Copeland could help him with that. <br />She indicated that the Ohio Historical Inventory has listings of older buildings in Ohio. They <br />pulled the house he was thinking of buying and noted that Steve McQuillan did the site <br />inspection for the house and he is an expert on restoration of older homes in Cuyahoga County. <br />Mr. Pidcock indicated that there was a stone in the basement foundation with the year 1830 <br />inscribed on it. Mrs. Lord commented that the records show that it was built in 1860 and the <br />inspection that Mr. McQuillan did says 1880. Ms. VanAuken suggested that a new house could <br />have been built over the foundation from an older house. Mrs. Lord indicated that there were 5 <br />small cabins on Columbia Rd., which were built around 1830, but this house doesn't quite match <br />the architecture of that era. She made some suggestions as to how he could go back and <br />research the history of the home. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned if this house was ever plaqued. <br />Mrs. Lord replied no, there is no plaque on it. She indicated that she would mail a copy of the <br />records that the commission had on the house. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned what work he was <br />going to do on the house. Mr. Pidcock replied that nothing has really been done to the house in <br />30 years. He might put a pitch on the garage roof and clean it up a little. The electrical needs to <br />be updated for sure. Mr. Barker explained that he could do anything he wanted to this house <br />seeing that it is not in the historical district and it is not plaqued. On the other hand, if he does <br />get it plaqued, anything you go to do on the outside would have to be restricted to some sense. <br />Mrs. Lord suggested looking at the plaque on the outside of this building (Old Town Hall) when