Laserfiche WebLink
:w <br />? <br />CI'I'Y OF+' NOlaTH Og,1VISTEI9 <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFEIBENCE" <br />ARCHI'TEC'Y'URAI. REVIEW BOARD <br />MINiJTES - MARCH 21, 2001 <br />CONFERENCE ROOM <br />5:30 P.M. <br />ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman, Zergott called the meeting to order at 5:32pm. <br />PRESENT: Chairman Zergott, Board members; M. Yager, T. Liggett, K. Schulz, and J. Nader. <br />ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Building Commissioner, T. iZymarczyk, and Assistant Clerk of <br />Commissions, S. Solomon. <br />II, REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF NIlNUTES: The Architectural Review Board minutes for <br />November 15, 2000 have been submitted for approval. <br />Chairman Zergott questioned if there were any corrections or additions to the November 15, <br />2000 minutes. <br />B. Zergott motioned to approve the minutes as written. The motion was seconded by T. Liggett, <br />roll call on the motion; B. Zergott, M. Yager, T. Liggett, and K. Schulz, yes, J. Nader, abstain. <br />Moteon Approved. <br />III. SIGNS: No Items. <br />V. BUSINESS: <br />1) Lighthouse Pools; 25601 Lorain Road <br />Proposal consists of an addition to the existing building. Note: Planning Commission gave a <br />favorable recommendation to the Board of Zoning Appeals on 2/13/01. Board of Zoning <br />Appeals granted variances on 3/1/01. I'lanning Commission heard this case again at the 3/13/01 <br />meeting and approved it (pending Architectural Review Board). <br />1VIr. Zergott called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. Steve Schill, the <br />architect, and Pat Goold, the owner, came forward to review fhe proposal. Mr. Schill explained <br />to the board that they were planning to demolish the office building on Lorain and Bailey and <br />extend Litehouse down to Bailey. The new building will be 2 stories because of the drop off. <br />The basement will just be for storage. They don't plan on changing any of the building materials, <br />designs, or colors of the existing Litehouse and the new addition will match the existing <br />building. He then explained that Planning Cominission had asked them to chop seven feet off <br />the west side. They received eight variances from the Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. Yager <br />questioned which store was in tKe present center bay. Mr. Schill replied that the ratio is Big and <br />Tall at 3/8 and Litehouse is 5/8 of the entire existing building, with Litehouse on the eastern side. <br />Mr. Yager commented that the corner pyramid pieces on top of the building don't look <br />proportionate to each other. He then questioned if they would continue the fencing. Mr. Schill <br />explained that the Planning Commission had asked them to drop the last 25 ft. of the fence down <br />to 3 ft. in height. IVIs. Schulz questioned the elevation of the screened mecharucal units. W. <br />Yager replied 4 ft. 6 1/2 inches. Ms. 5chulz commented that the new addition crown is just a <br />long span with nothing to compliment the other side where Litehouse will take over. She then <br />questioned what the lease space ratio will be when this is done. Mr. Goold replied it should be <br />2/3 and 1/3. Mr. Yager questioned what the building they would be demolishing was used for.