Laserfiche WebLink
Y• - k <br />CITY OF NOIZTH OI.MSTED <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE" <br />SPECIAL BOARD OF BUILDING CODE APPEALS <br />MINUTES - DECEMBER 18, 2002 <br />IN COUNCIL CHAlVIBERS <br />5:00 P.M. <br />1. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman Puzzitiello called the meeting to order at 5:20 p.m. <br />PRESENT: Chairinan, R. Puzzitiello, Board Members; M. Conway, P Engoglia and N. Althen. <br />ALSO PRESENT: Building Commissioner, D. Conway and Clerk of Commissions, D. Rote. <br />ABSENT: Board member R. Klesta. <br />U. REVEEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: <br />The minutes of the November 14, 2002 Board of Building Code Appeals meetings have been <br />submitted for approval. <br />R. Puzzitiello enotioned to approve the November 14, 2002 Board of Building Code of <br />Appeals minutes as written. P. Engoglia seconded the motion, which was unanimously <br />approved. <br />III. BUII.DING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br />1. David Mortach; 3391 Bridg,eport Drive: <br />Proposal consists of a vinyl fence. <br />A variance to have 51 feet of the proposed vinyl fence run parallel to an existing chainlink <br />fence along rear property line, (code does not allow multiple fences on property), section <br />(1369.03 A 3). <br />Chairmin Puzzitiello called all interested parties forward to review the request. Mr. Mortach <br />the owner and Mr. Gates with Gates fencing company came forward to review the proposal. <br />P. Engoglia motioned to approve David Mortach of 3391 Bridgeport Drive his request <br />that consists of a vinyl fence. The variance to have 51 feet of vinyl fence run parallel to <br />the existing chainlink fence along rear property line (code does not allow multiple fences <br />on property), section (1369.03 A 3). Provided there are tdvo gates are on either side to <br />aIlow egress to the storm sewer. The proposed vinyl fence is designed so that each 4-foot <br />section is i-emovable. Therefore, the fence can be placed directly up to the egisting fence <br />and the lpplicant will remove sections of the fence for the neighbors if they need to do <br />maintennnce on their fence. <br />Boards Comments and Questions: <br />Mr. M. Conway voiced that the City ordinance states fences placed parallel are not allowed. <br />Mr. Engoglia i-eviewed that Board of Building Code of Appeals can grant a variance to the <br />applicant to allow his fence to be placed parallel to the existing fence. The applicant has stated <br />that his neiahbor refuses to allow him to replace their chainlink fence with the proposed vinyl <br />fence. Mr. M. Conway questioned if in fact the neighbors refused to allow the applicant to <br />replace tlle chainlink fence with something more esthetically pleasing. Mr. Mortach indicated