Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF NO1tTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE" <br />BOARD OF BUILDING CODE APPEALS <br />AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 18, 2003 <br />IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS <br />5:30 P.M. <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman Puzzitiello called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. <br />PRESENT: Board members; M. Conway, P. Engoglia and N. Althen. , <br />ABSENT: Chairman R. Puzzitiello and Board member R. Klesta. <br />ALSO PRESENT: Building Commissioner D. Conway, and Clerk of Commissions D. Rote. <br />II. REVIL-EW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: <br />The Board of Building Code Appeals minutes for September 4, 2003 have been submitted <br />for approval. <br />Acting chairman Engoglia indicated that the board would defer addressing the September 4, <br />2003 minutes until meeting next. <br />M. OLD BUSINESS: <br />William & Susan. Minnich, 3474 West 231St Street, VVRD2 <br />A variance for an adjacent board fence 9 inches west of the property line. <br />(1369.03 (a) (3)) General requirements for fences: Where a neighbor has already installed <br />a fence along a property line, an additional fence will not be permitted. <br />NOTE: This proposal was tabled on 8/21/03 and 9/04/03. <br />Acting Chairman Engoglia called all interested parties forward to review the request. Mr. <br />Minnich came forward to address his request. Mr. Engoglia reviewed that the board <br />received a letter from the neighbor but could not accept it as it suggests that the neighbor <br />would have the right to remove the section of fence on his lot at any time. 1dIr. Minnich <br />indicated that he had not seen the letter and has tried to work something out but with the <br />new changes, he would just like to erect the fence and leave a 9-inch gap between the <br />fences. Mr. Wiebausch requested that the board table the issue again until he retains a <br />lawyer. The Commissioners did not feel that the applicant should be held up any longer. <br />Mr. Conway suggested that he would be reluctant to keep the applicant from fencing in his <br />own yard. Discussion suggesting the fence be placed two feet from rear property line took <br />place, Mr. Minnich did not feel it would be fair to him when the neighbor is only 9 inches <br />off his property line. He felt it was his responsibility to protect his neighbors from his dogs <br />but if the issue could not be settled he would just build a fence to what code allows. Mr. <br />Wiebausch felt that there had to be something between the end of his fence and the <br />applicant's fence or the dogs would get out. Mr. Engoglia did not think it was fair to the <br />applicant to have to wait another month. Mr. Conway advised the board members that they <br />needed to determine where the fence is to be place. Mr. VJesta questioned if the applicant <br />would be willing to move the fence inward. Mr. Minnich commented that he did not want