My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/10/2003 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2003
>
2003 Landmarks Commission
>
02/10/2003 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:49:21 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 7:45:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2003
Board Name
Landmarks Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF IiTORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER V6VE CAN 1VIAKE A DIFFERENCE!" <br />LANDMARKS COMMISSION <br />1VIINUTES - FEBRUARY 10, 2003 <br />IN OLD TOWN HALL <br />7:00 P.M. <br />I. ROLL CALL: Chairman Lang called the meeting to order at 7:09 p.m. <br />PRESENT: Chairinan Lang, Board inembers: P. Barker, T. Dubowski, G. Corell, J. Dailey, B. Lord, <br />M. Davis, K. O'Rourke, and L. VanAuken <br />II. RECEPTION OF VISITORS: Mr. Lang explained he had this itein added to the agenda but he would <br />like to have it moved to item III on the agenda. In case there are visitors, they can be moved up to the <br />front before addressing New Business. The reason for this is, he received a phone call from Mrs. Trudy <br />Schooley, who is the owner of the home directly across the street from the Barton Bradley soccer fields. <br />She informed Mr. Lang she is desirous of information as to how to go about getting a plaque for the <br />house and Mr. Lang invited her to attend the meeting tonight hoping the board could talk to her about the <br />process and give her the forms that are now used. Mr. Lang indicated Mrs. Schooley is not present so he <br />will call her and make arrangements to send her the application forms and then entertain questions from <br />her as to how to complete them. <br />III. REVEF-W AND CORRECTION OF MEVUTES: The Landmarks Commission minutes from the <br />January 13, 2003 meeting have been submitted for approval. <br />K. O'Rourke made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. The motion was seconded by G. Corell <br />and unanimously approved. <br />[II. NEW BUSINESS: <br />Mr. Lang indicated the only new business is the memo that he penned to Mayor Musial, Council <br />members, the Finance Director, and Building Commissioner in regard to the Heritage Home Loan <br />program. He indicated to the board that he would make a call to the Cleveland Restoration Society about <br />the program to find out answers to questions that they seemed to have about it. As indicated in his memo, <br />he was chagrined to say the least to find out this is a$5,000 annual fee as opposed to a one-time fee, but <br />they provide an awful lot of service for this amount of money. Mr. Lang said this in no way supplants <br />any of the city requirements for building restoration and renovation. What they do is augment by <br />providing additional services that the city would not customarily do to preserve a heritage home, and a <br />heritage hoine by the Cleveland Restoration Society is anything defined as 50 years of age or older. He <br />said he supposes the board could come up with its own definition but that is their criteria. Which tneans <br />that there are an awful lot of homes in this city that would be eligible for restoration funds, however this <br />is not just a home remodeling low interest loan. This has to be done according to the Secretary of the <br />Interior's standards for rehabilitation, which go way beyond the city building code. That is one of the <br />purposes for being able to provide this low interest loan; to maintain the homes in their historic nature <br />and to rehab them as such. He talked to Sarah Wolfe and they would provide assistance to the <br />homeowner in completing a loan application which would then be submitted to the bank for their <br />approval as well as to the treasurer of the county and they determine the eligibility of the property. They <br />would review the project plans in accordance with the federal standards. They provide on site inspection, <br />much the same as our Building Department, but they would be looking for things that are entirely <br />different. They submit progress reports and require the homeowner to submit progress reports so that the <br />project is completed in a timely fashion. They would provide the homeowner with a certificate of <br />completion, which does not mean that it takes the place of the Building Department's occupancy permit, <br />or the final inspection permit; these are two entirely separate processes. Some time and savings would be <br />brought to the Building Department due to relief from some of the activities normally encountered in a <br />building project and additional income may come to the city due to increased property values, unless they
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.