My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/08/2025 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2025
>
Planning and Design Commission
>
10/08/2025 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2026 1:56:44 PM
Creation date
3/5/2026 1:56:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2025
Board Name
Planning & Design Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/8/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING&DESIGN COMMISSION <br /> CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br /> MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8,2025 <br /> ROLL CALL <br /> Mr.David called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. <br /> Present: Tom David, Jose Leon,Brenton Mineo, Tony D'Alessandro,Ms.Kalin <br /> Staff:Director Max Upton, City Engineer Don Sheehy,Assistant Director of Law Bryan <br /> O'Malley Administrative Assistant Lyn Wilson <br /> OLD BUSINESS <br /> 321-2025; Sommers Development Group; 25896 Butternut Ridge Rd. <br /> The report focused on a preliminary plan review.It was explained that such plans are required by <br /> code to be reviewed with a planned development application.Notifications were sent to <br /> adjoining property owners as required by law, and rezoning notifications are issued to properties <br /> within 1,000 feet. <br /> The intent of the planned development zoning code was outlined—to promote innovative, <br /> compact,pedestrian-friendly designs with diverse housing types and efficient infrastructure use, <br /> aligning with the city's comprehensive plan. The plan supported infill development,mixed-use <br /> housing, and sustainable practices consistent with the community's goals. <br /> Previous site designs showed iterations from 68 units to 45 units. The current plan maintained 45 <br /> units but included revisions to orient one building toward Butternut Ridge Road based on earlier <br /> feedback. The new layout improved street presence and integrated green and community spaces. <br /> Population trends were noted,highlighting a decline since 1980 due to aging housing stock and <br /> lack of new development.The comprehensive plan emphasized the need for housing upgrades to <br /> remain competitive and attract residents. <br /> The report concluded that the project met the city's long-term goals, and the developer <br /> demonstrated cooperation and responsiveness.Approval was recommended with three <br /> conditions:preservation and restoration of the historic house under the Landmarks <br /> Commission's Certificate of Appropriateness, legal review of the homeowners association <br /> declarations,and final approval contingent on zoning approval. <br /> Comments were made in support of the director's report and the three recommended conditions. <br /> It was noted that further details would need to be addressed regarding the homeowners <br /> association declarations and the preservation of the historic house. The project was emphasized <br /> as being at the start of the process,with rezoning still required to change the property from <br /> single-family to planned development. The importance of adhering to the city's master plan was <br /> reiterated, as directed by the charter,which outlines the Planning Commission's responsibility to <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.