Laserfiche WebLink
LANDMARKS COMMISSION <br /> CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br /> MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 8,2025 <br /> 6:00 PM <br /> Mr.Neville called the meeting to order at 6 PM. <br /> Present: David Neville, Mark Madden, Sarah Egan-Reeves,Tom Dubowski Absent: Shuler <br /> Staff: Stephen Holowicki, Economic and Community Development Coordinator,Law Director <br /> Michael Gareau, Councilwoman Hemann. <br /> REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> Ms. Egan Reeves moved, seconded by Mr. Dubowski,to approve the September 3rd Landmarks <br /> Commission minutes. The motion was approved 4-0. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> PLAN 000319-2025; Richard and Tara Hulec; 26561 Butternut Ridge Road <br /> Discussion began relative to installation replacement of 11 old windows.A background <br /> discussion followed regarding work that had already been completed. Holowicki recommended <br /> to approve C of A. Dubowski moved to approve. Shuler seconded. <br /> OLD BUSINESS <br /> PLAN-000233-2025;Richard Whitt: 26840 Butternut Ridge Road. COA application <br /> Continuation of review from 9/2/2035.Applicant conveyed that he had not furnished updated <br /> drawings and that he was unsure of where the Miller Roofing ordered drawings had originated <br /> from Gerber Lumber. It was further conveyed that the dimensions were not correct. <br /> Councilwoman Hemann reiterated from the previous meeting that the dimensions were incorrect <br /> and that the drawings were not representative of his will. Holowicki was asked to comment.He <br /> stated that the city would not take a position as such and deferred to the commission. Mr. <br /> Neville stated that there would not be enough room for new overhangs and the ability to <br /> construct. Egan-Reeves stated that as a craftsman style home, it needs to include the architectural <br /> elements and that the commission needs to see the renderings and that the look of the home <br /> would be maintained. She further commented that if the drawings are not present then they could <br /> be reviewed at a subsequent meeting. Dubowski concurred and that the dimensions would not <br /> work. Madden expressed concerns over the 8-foot dimension.Neville suggested another <br /> extension and the applicant requested two more weeks. Ms. Hemann stated that she was not <br /> aware who ordered the drawings that she submitted to the department on August 11th. Mr. Whitt <br /> asked for clarification on what dimensions would be acceptable to the commission. Ms. Hemann <br /> discussed an alternate set of dimensions and then have the building department provided <br /> additional guidance. Holowicki recalled a previous suggestion to build one large, connected <br /> dormer. Hemann opined that the cost to build would be very high.Neville offered to table. <br /> Gareau suggested tabling to the next meeting.Neville concurred.Neville suggested getting <br />