My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-58 Resolution
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Legislation
>
2005
>
2005-58 Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2013 10:45:19 AM
Creation date
12/18/2013 9:01:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Number
2005-58
Legislation Date
5/17/2005
Year
2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.,_ <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2005 - 58 <br />By: Council Member McKay <br />A RESOLUTION CALLING ON THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES <br />TO REJECT PLANS TO PRIVATIZE SOCIAL SECURITY BY CUTTING <br />SOCIAL SECURITY'S GUARANTEED BENEFITS AND DIVERTING MONEY <br />OUT OF SOCIAL SECURITY INTO PRIVATE INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS <br />AND, FURTHER, CALLING ON CONGRESS TO COMMIT TO REPAYING TO <br />THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND THE MONIES IT HAS TAKENAND <br />SPENT FOR OTHER PURPOSES, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. <br />WHEREAS, Social Security's income protections — guaranteed, lifelong benefits, cost -of- <br />living adjustments to guard against inflation, increased benefits for families, greater income <br />replacement for low- income workers, and disability and survivor benefits — are the backbone of <br />retirement security and family protection in the United States; and <br />WHEREAS, Social Security provides crucial, often indispensable income protection for the <br />47 million individuals — one of every six Americans — receiving benefits; and <br />WHEREAS, Social Security is the nation's most successful and most important family <br />income protection program, but it has long -term funding needs we should address; and <br />WHEREAS, some policymakers propose to address these needs by cutting guaranteed <br />benefits and privatizing Social Security, that is, diverting a third or more of workers' payroll tax <br />contributions out of the Social Security Trust Fund and into private investment accounts; and <br />WHEREAS, privatization will worsen Social Security's funding needs by draining resources <br />from the Trust Fund into private accounts, increasing the federal deficit by $2 million over the first <br />decade alone and more in the future and putting us in deeper hock to foreign creditors; and <br />WHEREAS, some officials and members of Congress have suggested the federal <br />government will not pay back the money it has taken from the Social Security Trust Fund over the <br />past 20 years and used for other things, thereby denying working families the money they paid into <br />Social Security and leading to further benefit cuts; and <br />WHEREAS, privatizing Social Security will cut guaranteed benefits by 30 percent for young <br />workers, even for those who do not participate in private accounts, costing them $152,000 over their <br />retirements, denying them benefits they have earned and imperiling their economic security; and <br />-.- .,:: � � .F� >.o n.:Y+?'?Kt�'*M'fi�+b+�M �mEP.it 2'S'rs '�✓k�'a. -. �::n wrx .�.ai.. .. - �..:... ,.. I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.