My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-132 Resolution
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Legislation
>
2007
>
2007-132 Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2014 3:51:19 PM
Creation date
12/18/2013 11:05:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Number
2007-132
Legislation Date
12/4/2007
Year
2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br />EXHIBIT B <br />01-110 GOFT,'RNMEN7AL QP7=0C:,11' AGGREGJ710;N <br />l. Ohio Governmental Opt-Out Aggregation is the "iewel" of Ohio deregulation. <br />There have been issues and challenges faced by Ohioans regarding the price of electricity evei- <br />since deregulation was passed in SB3. In retrospect, many do not regard electricity <br />deregulation as a success. One area where SB3 clearly succeeded, however, was in creating <br />opt-out goveinmental aggregation in Ohio. Elected officials and regulators agree that <br />governmental aggregation has been a significant success. It has been recognized by the Ohio <br />CoiIsumers' Counsel as the "jewel" of Ohio deregulation and "the most successful <br />aggregation program in the nation." <br />2. Piā¢esei°ve customer choice through 2overnmentat a21!regation <br />As recommended by the Governor, Ohio should preserve a customer choice for residential <br />and small business customers through Opt-Out Governmental Aggregation. There are 2 types <br />of governmental aggregation, opt-in and opt-out. Opt-in aggregation has been tried in other <br />states. It has been inet with little success and small, if any, savings because it only secures <br />only a 5-8% consumer participation level. Ohio has the most successfill governmental <br />aggregation progl°an1 in the country becalise it permits communities to vote for Opt-Out <br />aggregation. Voters in hundreds of Ohio communities have voted to aggregate their <br />electricity requirements to increase their purchasing power and save money. The two largest <br />Ohio governmental aggregation groups, NOAC and NOPEC, have experienced 93 to 97% of <br />cligible consumers participating in their aggregation programs. Since 2001, NOPEC and <br />NOAC's consumers have saved au estimated $100 million on utility costs. <br />With this h-aclc record, it is easy to see why the Governor specifically recommended the <br />continuatioll of governmental opt-out aggregation in his recent hybrid electricity proposal. <br />NOAC and NOPEC agree that continuing opt-oiit governmental aggregation will help <br />i-esidential and small business consumers reduce their electric costs by giving them a choice. <br />To enhance the viability of opt-out aggregation NOAC and NOPEC propose a nLimber of <br />iiII provcments. <br />3. Necessary modifications to make Ohio Governmental A1!2re2ation more successful <br />A. By-passability on generation related charges. The major factor inhibiting <br />govenlmental aggregation ovei° the past 7 years has been large, non-bypassable generation <br />related utility charges. These charges are expiring in the next few years. Renamed charges of <br />2 1 S7020%-? 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.