2003-144 Ordinance - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? ??- ? Ordinance No. 2003-144 Page 3 rejected by the Building Official, who shall notify the applicant of the reasons for the rejection_ (c) In the event that the application contains a proposal which requests a variance or variances from the applicability of any provision of the Zoning Code of the City, but in all other respects complies with the zoning and all other applicable codes of the City, and is accompanied by all drawings and other documents and materials required by Section 1126.02 and by the rules of the Building Official, and, if applicable, by rule of the Planning Commission, it sha11 be first referred to the Director of Planning, who shall evaluate t6e development plan wit6in 30 days and refer it to the Architectural Review Board for its recommendations, at its next regularly scheduled meeting, and then to the Planning Commission for its recommendations on the variance request prior to referral to the Board of Zoning Appeals. (d) The Building Official and the Director of Planning may request, in the interest of expediting the review process and in anticipation of a Planning Commission requirement thereof, the comment or report of any appropriate City official or department and shall, in the event that development proceeds under subsection (c), provide a report and recommendation to the Planning Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals on the variances requested. (Ord. 2003-47. Passed 9-02-03) SECTION 2: That Section 1126.04 of Chapter 1126 of the Planning and Zoning Code of the City of North Olmsted, which presently reads as follows: 1126.04 REVIEW BY PLANNING COMMISSION. (a) Scope of Review. All applications for building permits which are properly referred to the Planning Commission shall be reviewed by the Commission for the purpose of making the following determinations only: (1) Whether the proposal will have any significant adverse impact on residential, commercial or other neighbors whose properties abut the property of the applicant; and (2) Whether the proposal will have any significant adverse impact on vehicular or pedestrian safety on the applicant's property, on the property of abutting owners, or within the adjoining right-of-way area; and (3) Whether the proposal will aesthetically have any significant adverse impact upon surrounding properties within the same zoning district. If an application has been improperly referred to Planning Com.mission by the Building Official, it shall not be reviewed by the Commission and shall be returned to the Building Official for further action pursuant to Section 1126.03 (b) Deternunation of Significant Adverse Impact. In making the determinations required by subsection (a) hereof, the Planning Commission shall only consider the following items as having potential adverse affect: (1) With respect to impact on residential, commercial or other neighbors: building location and direction, proposed exterior lighting, anticipated noise or odors to be generated by the proposed