My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
95-032 Resolution
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Legislation
>
1995
>
95-032 Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2014 3:25:50 PM
Creation date
12/23/2013 11:19:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Number
95-032
Legislation Date
3/7/1995
Year
1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- 17 - <br />measures taken and to be taken to prevent or minimize the <br />noncompliance, a statement as to whether Defendant is claiming <br />Force Majeure, and the bases for Defendant's claim of Force <br />Majeure. Such notification shall be promptly supplemented as <br />additional information becomes available to Defendant concerning <br />the circumstances of the noncompliance, measures taken or to be <br />taken in response to the noncompliance, and the bases for <br />Defendant's claim of Force Majeure. Defendant shall adopt all <br />reasonable measures to avoid or minimize any such noncompliance. <br />Failure to notify the United States within the time period <br />specified above shall constitute a waiver of any claim of Force <br />Majeure. Notification of any noncompliance, in and of itself, <br />shall not extend the time allowed for meeting any requirement or <br />excuse the delay or payment of stipulated penalties. <br />35. If the United States and Defendant agree that the <br />noncompliance is due to a Force Majeure event, the Parties may <br />petition the Court to extend compliance dates directly affected <br />by the delay for a period of time not to exceed the period of <br />delay resulting from such circumstances. <br />36. If the United States and Defendant cannot agree whether <br />the noncompliance is due to a Force Majeure event, the matter <br />shall be resolved pursuant to the Dispute Resolution provision of <br />this Decree. Defendant shall have the burden of going forward <br />and proving that the circumstances alleged to be causing the <br />delay or noncompliance constitute a Force Majeure event, that the <br />duration of the delay caused by such noncompliance is or was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.