Laserfiche WebLink
Plan of Study for City of North Olmsted Phase I by Floyd Browne Group January 4, 2006 <br />addition, the exact volume of the wet well was difficult to determine as the fillets and concrete <br />slab making up the influent channel were not exactly constructed as the station was designed <br />so some error was evident in volume calculations. <br />Still, much was learned during the test. The meter seemed to be accurate and the draw down <br />was smooth. The pumps appeared to be in good condition and operating within range. The <br />middle pump is pumping less than the other two at the 100% range and should be scheduled for <br />some maintenance during a low flow period to prepare for the spring storm season. The test <br />also gave the Floyd Browne Group staff a chance to look for vortexes that could impact the <br />pumping rate. No surface vortexes were observed. From the test it appears that the three <br />pump performance problems are not a result of mechanical failure or inconsistent pump <br />performance. There was no way of testing three (3) pumps simultaneously as the draw down <br />would be too rapid and airlock the pumps. <br />Conclusions <br />It appears that the station design is adequate for two (2) pumps and that the performance curve <br />is accurate for the actual performance of the station. The fact that the poor pumping <br />performance can be terminated with the by-pass pump recirculating the water in the wet well at <br />the critical wet well depth is evidence that the wet well geometry may be the issue. Internal <br />vortexing may be setting up when the head is at the 8-foot level affecting pump performance. <br />Another possibility is that low pressure areas may be setting up close to the pump intakes as a <br />result of the three pumps simultaneously in service. This could "starve" at least one of the <br />pumps preventing proper operation. The bypass pump would shift the low pressure area(s) <br />allowing proper operation at the critical wet well height. <br />The Floyd Browne Group recommends the following: <br />As the pump station flow is critical when three (3) pumps are required during <br />periods of high sanitary flow, a study should be performed using at least one <br />larger capacity pump so that only two (2) pumps are required to take care of <br />emergency situations. <br />2. More research on some of the causes of low pumping capacity at this wet well <br />level. <br />a. Vortex internal to the bell of the intake? <br />b. Stream lines setting up low pressure zones making suction difficult until <br />the bypass pump disturbs those stream lines and allows normal <br />operation. <br />1) Cones or angle iron on fillets disturbing the flow lines to avoid <br />using the bypass pump. <br />3. A cost analysis should be performed by studying the increase of pump capacity <br />vs. removal of I/I from the system by a foundation drain sump pump program or <br />by EQ basins to store, pump and treat. Theoretically, with an EQ tank installed, <br />no pump station improvements should be required. <br />4. Other economic analysis studies should be used to compare the following: <br />25 <br />