My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-064 Ordinance
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Legislation
>
2006
>
2006-064 Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2014 3:22:43 PM
Creation date
1/11/2014 2:49:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Number
2006-064
Legislation Date
3/8/2006
Year
2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Plan of Study for City of North Olmsted Phase I by Floyd Browne Group January 4, 2006 <br />FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS <br />Storm water contributions into the sanitary sewers from yard and roof areas are <br />significant from home sites although connections may be indirect. Although a palpable <br />pattern of sanitary/downspout tie-ins are not typically found, roof water and yard runoff <br />during storm events find channels into the foundation drains. Sump pumps are often <br />part of the network but final connection points are often obscure for sight. <br />2. The storm drain system is potentially undersized and bottlenecked in certain locations <br />according to hydraulic calculations. Theoretically, this would suggest that accumulating <br />surface water during sizeable precipitation events would place hydrostatic pressure on <br />the sanitary sewers via groundwater saturation. However, City maintenance workers <br />report that often the storm drain network is not surcharged or even flowing full even in <br />severe weather. In fact, during the benchmark August 20th storm episode, the critically <br />located 4' x 12' culvert bisecting under Clague Road had about a foot of freeboard at the <br />upper end or perhaps'/4 of its capacity remained. At the same time, basement and <br />sanitary sewer bypassing were underway. Similar reports were noted around town on a <br />smaller scale. This indicates that water is not reaching the storm drain network, <br />including runoff from home sites. A strong case cannot be made that reinforcements to <br />the storm drain system would improve the performance of the sanitary system and either <br />basement flooding or bypassing. <br />3. The mini-storm conveyance connections around each home site vary in design and <br />capacity and no attempt was made to characterize these systems in-terms of adequacy. <br />Accumulatively, they are the dominate storm drain attribute in the impact areas. <br />Typically, land use in residential neighborhoods is composed of about 80% roof areas, <br />lawn, driveway & sidewalks (house attributes) compared to about 20% street, curb & <br />gutter and utility easement areas. Thus, storm water run-off flow is primarily from <br />residential settings and storm capacity issues are due to the 80% portion of the land use. <br />Since it is somewhat questionable that peak residential storm flows reach the public <br />storm system with full intensity, the conclusion is that an unacceptable fraction of the <br />water is finding its way into basements or lower home levels and/or the sanitary system. <br />4. The capacity of the storm drain system is also called into question. Indications are that it <br />is handling the fraction of water that is directed to it but a much greater volume could <br />potentially come its way from the acres and acres of residential sources. A moderate <br />storm event would inundate the storm drain network based on hydraulic calculations (10 <br />to 25-year). A severe storm event (50-100-year) would cause widespread basement <br />flooding and sanitary sewer system impacts. This would be due to the flat topography of <br />the community. Overland sheet flow, ditch flow, and pipe flow simply cannot reach <br />velocities that would rapidly transport storm water away from the basements and <br />sanitary sewers (it should be pointed out that this topographic factor also has the upside <br />in not encouraging damage caused by rapidly moving water noted in hilly regions). <br />5. Both the LeBern and Dover pumping stations are operating at close to peak efficiencies. <br />Significantly higher gpm rates can be achieved only with extensive physical <br />modifications. The so-called "vortexing" phenomena could probably be greatly reduced <br />or even eliminated by wet well modifications but a general increase in pumping capacity <br />would not result. A second pumping factor is the downstream force main velocity and <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.