|
APRIL !~, 1961 -PAGE 2
<br />Resolution No. 61«66 was introduced by Mrs. Nicholas. A resolution accepting
<br />the provisions of proposed H.B. 667 and declaring an emergency. It was moved
<br />by Mrs. Nicholas, seconded by Mr. Caster, that the statutory rule be suspended
<br />and the resolution be read immediately the second and third times and put on
<br />its passage. The affirmative vote on said motion was as follows: Caster, Christman,
<br />Mangani, Nicholas, OtNeill, Porter. Thereupon the resolution was read the seo~ nd
<br />and third times aryl. put upon its passage and the affirmative vote thereon was
<br />as follows: Caster, Christman, Mangani, Nicholas, OtNeill, Porter.
<br />Ordinance No. 67,67 was introduced by Mr. Porter. An ordinance amending section
<br />~ of Ordinance 354 entitled ~An Ordinance providng for the punishment for
<br />offenses against the public peace and morals enacted June 3, 1930~~ and declaring
<br />an emergency. It was moved by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mrs. Nicholas that the
<br />statutory rule be suspended and the ordinance be read immediately the second and
<br />third times and put on its passage. The affirmative vote on said motion was
<br />as follows: Caster, Christman,, Mangani~ Nicholas, OtNeill, Porter. Thereupon
<br />the ordinance was read the second and third times arxi put upon its passage and
<br />the affirmative vote thereon was as follows: Caster, Christman, Mangani, Nicholas,
<br />O~Neill., Porter.
<br />Resolution No. 61••68 was introduced by Mr. Mangani. A resolution accepting the
<br />plat of Columbia Estates Development, Inc., for recording purposes only, and
<br />declaring an emergency. The resolution was given its first reading only.
<br />Resolution No. 61•-69 was introduced by Mr. Christman. A resolution declaring
<br />the necessity of constructing sanitary sewe#~ in Columbia Road and G~adland Avenue,
<br />and declaring an emergency. It was moved by Mr. Christman, seconded by Mr.
<br />Mangani, that the statutory rule be suspended and the resolution be read immediately
<br />the second and third times and put on its passage. The affirmative vote on said
<br />motion was as follows: Caster, Christman, Mangani, Nicholas, O~Neill, Porter.
<br />2'hereupon the resolution was read the second and third times and put upon its
<br />passage and the affirmative vote thereon was as follows: Caster, Christman
<br />Mangani~ Nicholas, O~Neill, Porter.
<br />Mr. l~ristman advised of a Sewer Committee meeting to be held at City Ha11 on
<br />April 7, 1961 at 8 P.M. with the Mayor, Service and FiIIar~ce Directors, the
<br />Solicitor and representative of Floyd Browne & Associates pertaining to Parkview*s
<br />participation in our Sewer program and invited any other Council memlBer who
<br />wish to attend
<br />Mr. Margani reported on a meeting of the Planning Commission and a representative
<br />of Howard Whipple Green Associates regarding a proposed motel at the Par Three
<br />Golf Course and stated that more information will be forthcoming.
<br />The Service Director recommended the release of X1,000.00 sidewalk Bond for
<br />North Olmsted Estates.
<br />The Service Director requested authority to take bids on 300 ton of T«.35 asphalt.
<br />Mr. Christman maned, seconded by Mr. Mangani, that Council go on record that
<br />the policy of the City in regards to the Dover Road Widening be as follows:
<br />1. That extension of all former County ditch culverts for
<br />sidewalks construction be included in the project cost
<br />of the sidewalk.
<br />2. That no compensation be paid for the right of way. If it
<br />is necessary prior to institution of condemnaicion proceedings
<br />to offer compensation that a nominal offer only be made. If
<br />the property ewner does not accept the nominal offer; then
<br />let the Court set the compensation.
<br />3. That trees which die within 1 year after construction of the
<br />sanitary sewer dus to removal of roots during excavation of
<br />trenches or for other reasons attributable toihe sewer
<br />construction that the trees be removed by the City with no
<br />expense to the land owner and that reasonable compensation be
<br />awarded the inured property owner for the loss of the tree.
<br />!t. That compensation, if any, for trees located in the right of
<br />way desired which will be removed during sewer or sidewalk
<br />construction be negotiated between the property owner and the
<br />City .
<br />5. That a 60 foot right of way is necessary.
<br />
|