Laserfiche WebLink
September 1, 1964 - Page 7 <br />rhat the ruie requiring that the ordinance be re4d in f.t,ll be suspend`:_r. <br />R_ffirznat_vE vota tneressn was as £oY?aws: e,aster, Hodgins, 3.eonard, Limpers. <br />14ngarai r F"c1.tz: Mr, Fo1t2 then mrsvedt seconded by Mr. Caster, that the <br />n?-dinanc2 be adapted. Aff_irmative vot` thexean was as follows: Caster. <br />lodginq; Leonard; Lienpert, Man?ani, Fslts <br />Ordanance No. 64-137 was intrcaduced bv Mr.. C;as*er: An Ordinance author i_, ,,.q <br />0?-?0 ,,r,recting the cancellation saf special assesfimenk:s on Per,manert P-rcel Nr, <br />07'7 15--43, bt°J."1g en a55e5sllEe??t fuY` f'db?l,"',t$`tlctYon of a Ga°atk.'x` l71T7€° s and decn _ *, <br />;^g rr, amergen^y. Mr. Caster mad€ a mation, secoa??ed by Mrs. Hcsigins ';,_>,,. <br />'ha "'a?a reqt_3iriTkg tkl*'ff'.e sepaCat° r"'ading.?'s of the ordinr.;aLe Z3e s1?.Sp??dno <br />_ r?"',oK:7Cr`? ???te tl!?2R'gdSn waS aS f13lla?.,'?S : Z:°c`rte;r , Pol2 iats, YJmo?1iaY'dq Y ono' " <br />mar,sx&_ Foltz mfi, L;aSt2r th2n NCnawAed, ?eanndGi`, by Mrs, $&odgLS:s shat !!' ,. <br />. C _ ^quiL`T,n_cc tx.._` rht° t11Cdvfi@u?Lea "ibY rean in fe.,Nll be seGsp?ri'dt1ed. ;x f rn;_. <br />y';,''' _° "Yh,eY'eon "vJ'aS ^cS follCYCtY`,?' . fiast?.'$' y Botu'`gi!!?sq ??aor?ak'?:' ,i LiTd"pe'1 $ h'JVv_r g^r_ , <br />: ;:',_ :_ ,, Mr. CaGt`.r rhen moved, secandqd b?r ;??rs_ ????dgiA:s t?tt?at the ?x ? nw . <br />-, .`cr-?.?-?3, I?ffirruative vcrte t&?k??:e•??? ??as ? r? follows: Cast: rw Hodrrin-, <br />t.,-cnar1, Limpert; Mang?ni, Folta. <br />Ordin<^,??e No 64_738 was introduced tay Mrs. Hoc?gins. .4n Ordinance au*bor• < <br />^g and di>ecting the c2nc°112ta.on of specia?. ???e8smants ort Permatter,t P oA <br />R,Vo ?32-"e^ _12y be11?g a1!4 aSsc^SSl3AeLpt fd3r l'"'.3K4stt'uct$oxe of .? w2.teY l1C1e, r`6nd ,j<: <br />L: qring a;ti emergency, Mrs, Hodgins made a mo* aop, secanded hy Mr. , Mangaa i: <br />11a?t the rnte requiring th.ree separate reaclings of the ordinance be suspen?o;3. <br />* ffirrzp_ativry vote theN-eoP-a was 2S f*31 lowS : (saster, TrlodginS y Leonard, L imper" <br />t. nganr_, Foltz. Mrc. Hodatns then moved, secons£ed by Mr. Mangani, that. 401 <br />ro1e requiring the ordinance to be read i.n full he sasspended. Aff irina+ i<.>e <br />Wcte there,n was as follows, Gasterd Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani; <br />rr,l*z, Mrs. Hodgan? then moved, se;conded b,r Mr. Mangani, that the ordin,?yrot? <br />be adopted. Affirma:ive vci:e there.on was as follaws: vaster, Hndgins, IRenard, <br />Li€npert, Mangani, Foltz. <br />Ordinance No. 54-189 was introduczd by Mr, Mangani. An ordinance au*kYorTzi.ng <br />and directing the cancellatican a£ speciai assessments can Permanent Parrr?l No. <br />232_1--12 beirag an assessment for px°eparatiote af p1ans and specj.fications fe-,r <br />sanietary sewers, and declarirsg an emergency, ?V1r, Mangani made a motion, se- <br />randed by Mr. Leonard, that the rul.e reqiriring three separate reac3i.ngs of the <br />ordinance be suspended. Affirmative vote therecan wras as follows; Caster. <br />Hodgins, Leonard, Y impert, Mangani„ Foltz. rir. Mangani then moved, se.^.<.;ncseri <br />by Mr. Leonard, tha+t the rule requilring the nrdinance to be r.ead in f€all R7e <br />suspended, Affirmative vote thereon was as fc?Vows: Caster, Hodgins, I.Fonatd, <br />Limpert, Mangani, F'oltz, Mr, Mangani then moved, seconc3ed by Mr. Leonard, <br />that the ordinance be adopted. Aff irmati.ve vate thereon was as fol2ows, <br />Caster, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, Foltz, <br />Ordinance No. 64--190 wae introducee3 by Mr, Leonarc3, At. Ordinance author.=_zi.ng <br />and directing the cancellatian of special assessments an Permanent Parcel No, <br />232-21-9 being an assessment for the preparation oE plaris and specificatiuns <br />for sanitary sewers, and declaring an emergency, Mr. Leanard made a mc?tion. <br />saconded by Mr. Limpert, that the rule requiring three separate readings c>f <br />the ordinance be suspended. Affirmative vote therean was as follows: Caster, <br />Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, Foitz. Mr. Leonard then moved, seconded <br />by Mr, Limpert, that the rule requiring the ordinance to be read in full be <br />suspended. Affirmative vote thereon was as follows: Caster, Hodgins, <br />Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, Foitz. Mr. Leanard then moved, seconded by <br />. ?. ?., . ? ., <br />? ,. ,?