September 1, 1964 - Page 7
<br />rhat the ruie requiring that the ordinance be re4d in f.t,ll be suspend`:_r.
<br />R_ffirznat_vE vota tneressn was as £oY?aws: e,aster, Hodgins, 3.eonard, Limpers.
<br />14ngarai r F"c1.tz: Mr, Fo1t2 then mrsvedt seconded by Mr. Caster, that the
<br />n?-dinanc2 be adapted. Aff_irmative vot` thexean was as follows: Caster.
<br />lodginq; Leonard; Lienpert, Man?ani, Fslts
<br />Ordanance No. 64-137 was intrcaduced bv Mr.. C;as*er: An Ordinance author i_, ,,.q
<br />0?-?0 ,,r,recting the cancellation saf special assesfimenk:s on Per,manert P-rcel Nr,
<br />07'7 15--43, bt°J."1g en a55e5sllEe??t fuY` f'db?l,"',t$`tlctYon of a Ga°atk.'x` l71T7€° s and decn _ *,
<br />;^g rr, amergen^y. Mr. Caster mad€ a mation, secoa??ed by Mrs. Hcsigins ';,_>,,.
<br />'ha "'a?a reqt_3iriTkg tkl*'ff'.e sepaCat° r"'ading.?'s of the ordinr.;aLe Z3e s1?.Sp??dno
<br />_ r?"',oK:7Cr`? ???te tl!?2R'gdSn waS aS f13lla?.,'?S : Z:°c`rte;r , Pol2 iats, YJmo?1iaY'dq Y ono' "
<br />mar,sx&_ Foltz mfi, L;aSt2r th2n NCnawAed, ?eanndGi`, by Mrs, $&odgLS:s shat !!' ,.
<br />. C _ ^quiL`T,n_cc tx.._` rht° t11Cdvfi@u?Lea "ibY rean in fe.,Nll be seGsp?ri'dt1ed. ;x f rn;_.
<br />y';,''' _° "Yh,eY'eon "vJ'aS ^cS follCYCtY`,?' . fiast?.'$' y Botu'`gi!!?sq ??aor?ak'?:' ,i LiTd"pe'1 $ h'JVv_r g^r_ ,
<br />: ;:',_ :_ ,, Mr. CaGt`.r rhen moved, secandqd b?r ;??rs_ ????dgiA:s t?tt?at the ?x ? nw .
<br />-, .`cr-?.?-?3, I?ffirruative vcrte t&?k??:e•??? ??as ? r? follows: Cast: rw Hodrrin-,
<br />t.,-cnar1, Limpert; Mang?ni, Folta.
<br />Ordin<^,??e No 64_738 was introduced tay Mrs. Hoc?gins. .4n Ordinance au*bor• <
<br />^g and di>ecting the c2nc°112ta.on of specia?. ???e8smants ort Permatter,t P oA
<br />R,Vo ?32-"e^ _12y be11?g a1!4 aSsc^SSl3AeLpt fd3r l'"'.3K4stt'uct$oxe of .? w2.teY l1C1e, r`6nd ,j<:
<br />L: qring a;ti emergency, Mrs, Hodgins made a mo* aop, secanded hy Mr. , Mangaa i:
<br />11a?t the rnte requiring th.ree separate reaclings of the ordinance be suspen?o;3.
<br />* ffirrzp_ativry vote theN-eoP-a was 2S f*31 lowS : (saster, TrlodginS y Leonard, L imper"
<br />t. nganr_, Foltz. Mrc. Hodatns then moved, secons£ed by Mr. Mangani, that. 401
<br />ro1e requiring the ordinance to be read i.n full he sasspended. Aff irina+ i<.>e
<br />Wcte there,n was as follows, Gasterd Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani;
<br />rr,l*z, Mrs. Hodgan? then moved, se;conded b,r Mr. Mangani, that the ordin,?yrot?
<br />be adopted. Affirma:ive vci:e there.on was as follaws: vaster, Hndgins, IRenard,
<br />Li€npert, Mangani, Foltz.
<br />Ordinance No. 54-189 was introduczd by Mr, Mangani. An ordinance au*kYorTzi.ng
<br />and directing the cancellatican a£ speciai assessments can Permanent Parrr?l No.
<br />232_1--12 beirag an assessment for px°eparatiote af p1ans and specj.fications fe-,r
<br />sanietary sewers, and declarirsg an emergency, ?V1r, Mangani made a motion, se-
<br />randed by Mr. Leonard, that the rul.e reqiriring three separate reac3i.ngs of the
<br />ordinance be suspended. Affirmative vote therecan wras as follows; Caster.
<br />Hodgins, Leonard, Y impert, Mangani„ Foltz. rir. Mangani then moved, se.^.<.;ncseri
<br />by Mr. Leonard, tha+t the rule requilring the nrdinance to be r.ead in f€all R7e
<br />suspended, Affirmative vote thereon was as fc?Vows: Caster, Hodgins, I.Fonatd,
<br />Limpert, Mangani, F'oltz, Mr, Mangani then moved, seconc3ed by Mr. Leonard,
<br />that the ordinance be adopted. Aff irmati.ve vate thereon was as fol2ows,
<br />Caster, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, Foltz,
<br />Ordinance No. 64--190 wae introducee3 by Mr, Leonarc3, At. Ordinance author.=_zi.ng
<br />and directing the cancellatian of special assessments an Permanent Parcel No,
<br />232-21-9 being an assessment for the preparation oE plaris and specificatiuns
<br />for sanitary sewers, and declaring an emergency, Mr. Leanard made a mc?tion.
<br />saconded by Mr. Limpert, that the rule requiring three separate readings c>f
<br />the ordinance be suspended. Affirmative vote therean was as follows: Caster,
<br />Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, Foitz. Mr. Leonard then moved, seconded
<br />by Mr, Limpert, that the rule requiring the ordinance to be read in full be
<br />suspended. Affirmative vote thereon was as follows: Caster, Hodgins,
<br />Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, Foitz. Mr. Leanard then moved, seconded by
<br />. ?. ?., . ? .,
<br />? ,. ,?
|