|
SeptembPr 159 1964 - Page 3
<br />With regard to the Lorain Road sanita,ry sewer easement in the wester°ly end of
<br />town, the Commfttee recommends that orz certafn sections of Larain Rdad it be
<br />installed at the rear, provided the p:roperty owners involvEd do not suffer any
<br />undue penalty in respect to tfe-in cilarges, and that, if necessary, part of
<br />this charge be subsadized ta achieve this advantage,
<br />The Gommittee alsc recommends that legislatian be prepared to fix a permb.t
<br />fee of $5.00 for driveway aprons, which would not reflect the actual coSts
<br />i.nvolved, but would give t.he Cfty mare control as to what is actually i.nstalled
<br />as a driveway apran,
<br />Regarding the North Park stdrm water ditch cuiver.ting, the committee, recommends
<br />that the City purchase and install cmrrugated pipe for this purposeo The approxi-
<br />mate cost would be about $13,0009 witlz the developer of North Park partiripating
<br />in the amount of $29500,
<br />T'he committee agreed not to a11ow the developFr td install snnitary sewers in
<br />back property lines on four sublats om Porter Road, since eventually the
<br />frontage will bE servfced by a lateral, and it would mean double assessment,
<br />Mr, C. 0. Fischer, developer of the lots in question appeared before CcunciE.
<br />and offered to make a not.e in the improvement plan that the sanitary Linc-.
<br />would be a temporary sewer line, to be abandoned at the time the Gity put in
<br />a sewer line on Porter. This would permit immediate construction of houses
<br />on the lots. After some discussion, ,a meeting was set up with the Public
<br />Development after tonight's counc.il meeting.
<br />?:
<br />Mr. West, Chairman of the F'inance Committee, reported that on the sidewalk
<br />permits, it appears from a preliminar;y look, that the average home owner would
<br />get $15,00 refunded from his $40.00 permit, The Finance Directmr will figure
<br />the exacit amount,
<br />Ordinance Noe 646117 was given its third reading, An Ordinance amending SecY,
<br />1174,02 (Sethack Reguslations) and 117.4,03 (Setback on corner lots) or.
<br />Ordinance No, 62-33 (The Zuning Ordinance of the City of North Olmsted) re•-
<br />lating to setback requirements in retail business use districts. It was
<br />move.d by Mr. Leonard, seconded by Mr, Limpert, that the Ordinance be adoptedu
<br />Affirmative vote thereon was as follows: Caster, Foltz, Hodginsp Leonard,
<br />Limpert, 4Testa °°No" Mangania
<br />Ordinance No. 64-178 was given its second reading.
<br />Ordinance Noe 64W179 was givem i.ts second reading.
<br />Resolution No, 64-201 wa; intr.caduced by Mr, Caster, A Resolution accEpt.i.ng the
<br />improvement plans for Bretton Ridge Subdivision No, l, and declaring an emergency,
<br />Mr. Caster moved, seconded by Mr, Mangani, that the rule requiring three se.parate
<br />readings of the resalution be suspendeda Affirmative vote thereon was as
<br />followso Caster, Folt.z, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West, Nir. Caster
<br />then made a motbon, seconded by Mre Mangani, that the rule requiring t.hat the
<br />resolution be read in full be suspendedo Affirmative vote thereon was as
<br />follows: Caster, Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, Westo Mr, Caster
<br />then made a motion that the resolution be adopted. Motion was seconded by
<br />Mr, Mangani, and ithe affirmative vot.e thereon was as follows: Caster, Fo1tz,
<br />Hcdgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West,
<br />?? . ,?•????:????.-?.?.?????_?? ?? ?
|