?
<br />b,w? 19
<br />the rule requiring readin? -f t"E? .arainan?,e in i??? ???irety, seconded by Mr,
<br />Foltze AffirmativE vote wa?3 C??ter, F?1tz, riodgin,, Lecnardr Lianpert, Mangani,
<br />West. Mre Limparti then m:?ved f,. r aal-jlptj,«;n ??f t?.e 3rdinance, seconded by Mr.
<br />F''OZtZ. AffiL'tt72°t]LVe vc?,Ts was Ge°lsi".',sZ', F,»I"Z, i.">`Ag'?'?T1s, Le<-Ii'i$3"d, L1$RPeit9
<br />Mangani, Westo
<br />Ordinance Noe 63-257? ?a?:, '`'y Mr, ',?%')IT,Z< Az^? ?:)rdinance authorfzing
<br />and directing tre -nan????????? ????`al «_aez-,sme-nts jn Pei?anent Parcel No.
<br />232-3-36 being an a????sm??-'y inr p.-icagaxat,-,-n c,i: pYans and specificatiors
<br />for sanitary sewer??,,,, and de,t,larilig an ..??.?-Mr. 'E'aktz -movea3 for suspen-
<br />sion of tne rs.cle r?quiring th v?a w-a;ijl.??gi i irr:e ser?on?ed by Mr.
<br />Caster. Affirmatic°e vote?,-av T-7:tz, Leonard, Litnper*, Mangani,
<br />West. Mr. Fo1?z moved f,;r ,,m 'k: _e reaciing of the
<br />ordinance irc its e?????ty, "T'r NIL 4 , Afi?rmarica vote was Caster,
<br />Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Lzrnp,.2i , ma??--&.<., W,y?,*, ',Mr. F?,Itz then moved for
<br />adoption of tt?? ???inanc:,:, ?p byrn=. ?.?Pr, A.ffirmative vote thereon
<br />W8S ?,'flSteL'9 FOltZ o Aailgar'L, WF,'st.
<br />Ordinance N€so 65-258 was in?roducled i-y Mi. Cao-er, An Ordinance autharizing
<br />and directing the cance13,a??on -,r an Perma-tient Parcel No.
<br />231-5-36 being an assessment ff,?prepa??t?_'c;i of gians and sgecifications for
<br />4D sanitary sewerss and decI??ing ari etinerge?°.,?r?? ?M? C,?iEter mnved for suspension
<br />of the rule rc:quiring th?ec- sep???te readinga ;:,f -???e ordinance, seconded by
<br />Mrs. Hodgi.nsa Affirenativ,:? was Caoter. ?????z, Hcdgins, Leor?ard, Limpert,
<br />Mangani, West, Mr. Gaster wcve,d rkir 7r???enelon ot tce ruYe requxiring reading
<br />of the ordinance in its enti: sty 9 ??c,-_,."??U??d by Rodgins, Aff irmat ive vote
<br />was Caster, Fcltz, Hodgins, Leonard, L.aige'=°t, Mangani9 West. Mr. Caster then
<br />moved for adoption bf tn? ?rd???nce9 sv'?,:?nded bY Mr?. li-odgins. Affirmative
<br />vote was Caster, F'oItz, rndgins, Leonard, Limperr, Niangani, Weste
<br />Ordinance No. 65-259 was 'Lntrosiucec3 by Mrs. Hodginsa An Clydinance authorizing
<br />and directing the cancellation n.f ??ecia1 ao?se?sments on Periuanent Parcel No.
<br />231-5-36, being an assessment: for sanitax ysewer laterals, and des:laring an
<br />emergencyo Mrs, Hodgins moved to s*uspend *?e r??e re9.ui-ring three separate
<br />read ings of the ord i.xarr? e, ? ? --o• ded b3% Mr. Mangan i. Af firenat ive vot e was
<br />Caster, Foltz, Hcsdgins, Leonarci, Li+upert, Ma..gani, West, Mrse Hodgins moved
<br />for suspensi4n of the rule requiring reading off th' ordinance in its entirety,
<br />seconded by Mr. Manga-iiA Affirmative va??a wa, Ca.-fter, FoYtz, iiodgins, Leonard,
<br />Limpert, Manganis West. Mrd, Ti?,dgiris tric>n qioved f,?)r adoption of the ordinance,
<br />seconded by Mr, Mangani, Aff3x.•mative ???rp,°µ^ was Gaste., Folta, Hodgins,
<br />Leonard, Limpert q Mangani, Ws'?-_
<br />;i Ordinance No. 65-260 was in?rodi='ced by '?r, Mangami, An Ordinance authorizing
<br />and directing the can?elhtion of ??????l a'???????????? or. Permanent Parcel No.
<br />232-11-28, being an a????sment f?? ?anitary Ee'??er?? and decflaring an emergency.
<br />Mr. Mangani moved fca*_° sispensicn r,f the ru?e, re;airi?g three separate readings
<br />of the ordinance, seconded bY Mr, West, Affirmat°:ve. v??? was Caster, Foltz,
<br />Hodg ins , Leonard, L im.pt:rt, Mangan iP We° c.. Mr, Man?aMl movea £o: suspens ion
<br />of ths rule requiring reading, o' ?ne, o"din.ance i?'s its entiretY9 seconded by
<br />?
|