|
Page 5- April 6, 1965
<br />Affirmative vote was Gaster, Fmltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West,
<br />Mr. mangani'htoved for suspension of the rule requiring reading of the ordinance
<br />fn fts entirety, seconded by Mr. West, Affirmative vote was Caster, Foltz,
<br />Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West, Mr. Mangani then moved for adoption,
<br />seconded by Mr. West, Affirmatfve vote was Casterp Foltz9 Hodgins, Leonard,
<br />Limpert, Manganf, Weste
<br />Ordinance No. 65-77 was fntroduced by Mr. West, An Ordfnance authorizfng and
<br />directing the cancellation of special asseesments in Permanent Parcel No,
<br />23I-1-4 through 10, being an assessment for construction of a water line and
<br />declaring an emergency. Mr, West moved 'for suspension of the rule requiring
<br />three separate readings of the ordinance, seconded by Mr, Leonard, Affirma-
<br />tive vote was Caster, Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West, Mr.
<br />West then moved for suspension of the rule requirfng reading o€ the ordinance
<br />in its entirety, seconded by Mr. Leonard, Affirmative vmte was Gaster, Foltz,
<br />Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West, Mr. West then moved for adoption,
<br />aBconded by Mr. Lemnard. Affirmative vote was Caster, Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard,
<br />Limpert, Mangani, West.
<br />Ordinance No<65-78 was introduced by Mr. Leonard, An Ordinance authorizing
<br />and directing the cancellation of specfal assessments on Peraranent Parcel No.
<br />23I-1-4, being an assessment for construction of a water line, and declaring
<br />an emergency, Mr. Leonard moved for suspension of the rule requiring three
<br />separate readfngs of the ordinance, seconded by Mr. Lfmpert, Affirmative
<br />vote thereon was Caster, Folt2, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West,
<br />Mr. Leonard then moved for suspension of the rule requiring reading of the
<br />ordinance in its entirety, aeconded by Mr, Limpert, Affirmative vote was
<br />Caster, Foltz, Hmdgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West. Mr. Leonard then
<br />moved for adoption of the ordinance, seconded by Mr. Limpert< Affirmative
<br />vote thereon was Caster, Folta, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West.
<br />Ordinance No, 65-79 waa introduced by Mr, Limpert, An Ordinance authorizing
<br />and directing the cancellation of special assessmenta on Permanent Parcel No.
<br />234-25-9 being an assessment for preparation of plans and specifications for
<br />sanitary sewers, and declaring an emergency, Mr. Limpert moved for suspension
<br />of the rule requiring three separate readings of the ordinance, seconded by
<br />Mr. Foltz. Affirmative vote thereon was Caster, Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard,
<br />Limpert, Mangani, Weet, Mr. Limpert then moved for suspension of the rule
<br />requfring reading of the ordinance in its entirety, seconded by Mr. Foltz._.A
<br />Affirmative vote thereon was Caster, Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limptrt, Msngani,
<br />West, Mr, Limpert then moved for adoption of the ordinance, seconded by
<br />Mr. Foltz. Affirmative vote thereon was Caster, Foltz, Hodgfns, Leonard,
<br />Limpert, Mangani, West,
<br />Ordinanee No, 65-80 was introduced by Mr. Foltz, An Ordinanee authoriaing
<br />and directing the cancellation of apecial assessments on Permanent Parcel
<br />No, 231-3-45 befng an asseaement for preparation of plans anfl epecifications
<br />for asnitary sewers, and doclaring an omorgency, Mr. Folta moved for sue-
<br />pensian of the rule requiring three oaparttE readings of tha ordiriance,
<br />seeonded by Mr. Caeter. Affirtnitive vote thrreon was Caster, Foits, Hodginr,
<br />Laonard, Zimpert, Mangani, Weate Mr. Fdlt• thefl movad for ouspensinn of tho
<br />rule requiring reading of the otdinrnes in ito entirety, secondod by Mr. Catter.
<br />_ ?
|