|
Page 9 - February 2, 1965
<br />of the rule requiring ????e separate readings sf tiie ordinar.°?? ????,nded by
<br />Mro Caster, A?????????e vcte therecn was Casterr F????? flQdgi.??? ???nard,
<br />Lftn?ert9 Mangani, W?st, Mr, Fol?z then moved fa? ??z?????siun ?c,f the ??Jerequiring ,reading of the cr3lnan?e in it.s entirety, i(e,(?cn3ed by Mr, c,aster,
<br />.4ff irmatfve v?te was Caster9 F°oltz , Hcdginsy T:eonard9 L u.mpert,Mangani, Wast,
<br />Mr> Fo7.t2 t'hen move¢i for aduption of t1?? ord:.nance:9 'ty Mr. G:aster.
<br />Affirmative votre ti???ec.n was Caster, Foltz, Hiodgxns, LeL-iard, L;Gmpert,
<br />Mangani, West.,
<br />Mre West moveai tha? the kiscal Jffiz?er be reqa????ed t,;,rnYsh a ..°ertifacate
<br />as to the maximum ma°turity cf the mote issued in antx?,,.Igati_in r.I tt???C•llectivn
<br />of cuxrrent reveiues, ??c3ns?ed by Mro Caster. °°Yeas°" Caster, Foit.z, ff?,dgY.ns9
<br />I?eonak d 9 Limpert, Mangan i, West,
<br />The F'inance Director delivered hi's requested certif°wcave, ta the c"lerk,
<br />Ordinar_ce Noo 65m40 was Intr°oduced by Mra Castero An ordinan?:;e pr??vidi,ng for
<br />the issuance of a note im the amount of One Hundred "??ousanri Dollars in antf-
<br />cigation of current revenuesfor the fiscal year 1965 from the prcc?,eds of
<br />taxes 9 except advances tfiereon and taxes to be received from th?e payment. of
<br />debt e:harges, and declaring an emergencyo Mr. Gaster then muve21 for suspension
<br />mf the rule requiring three se-parate readings of the ordinan?ce. Mc.?,t'.on ss??
<br />???conded by Mr, Westo Affirmatfve vote thereon c??s Caster, F":ultz, 6?-)dgins,
<br />Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, W?sto Mr, Caster then mc;ved fn,? s-,.?spensi°:rr of
<br />the rule requiring reading of t.he, ,:?rdihane;:e in it-Q emtYrs:?y, se,v.)ndsJ by Mr,
<br />Weste Aff irmat ive vote thereun c,ras Caster, E"???tz, 14<3g ins, Lc; anard., L imgert,
<br />Mangani, West;, Mr. Caster t;hen moved for adoption ??f t he ordinan?es se;:onded
<br />by Mra West, Affi.rmative v?t(E thereon was Caster, FAtz, h?,dgLnSo Leonardm
<br />LimpErt, Mangan i, West,
<br />Mre Fo1tz r???????ed the Safety Service Dfrector to list. the streets wtiieh
<br />would be imgortant routes to be affected by the emergency snoti,r urdinance,
<br />which has been requested, Mro Limpert answere? that he feels that all streets
<br />should be affected, on which signs Frou1d 'be posted, T'heLaw, Dir?,,??toradvisect
<br />that an ordinance of this type would be unenforceable, since the overni.ght.
<br />parking ordinance wras g???ed by C-?uncil and was gart of a plan-. I"he emesgency
<br />snow ordinance would be arb_'t.rarY, and Councbl cannot pass dls?;-ret.ic,n on to
<br />the Safety-Service Director, 'I'herefore the sp?cifY?c. streets have to be named
<br />tm be affeuted,
<br />At this point Engineer Labas ca11e3 atteniion to an err.iz in tt-ke heacli.ng rn
<br />Ordinance 65-35, Mr, Ca?ter t.hen moved that the lheacding be (,:,hanged ito read
<br />'?noft si.de of DelmeLe Dr:ve`', En place of°'west side of C'lagLrc Roa3", Motion
<br />was secomded by Mrs, Hodgins. Yeas°" Caster, Fo'1tz, Hrldginso LE«?naxd, Limpert,
<br />Mangania W?sta
<br />Mr, West m??edy ?econded by :Mro 'Limpert, that the Safety Serv:??i, D%reit?or be
<br />authorized ta spend $200 for tne BR?s Dx°ivers` SafetyAward Dinner,
<br />Ca??er9 Folkz, Hodgi.nsQ Leanard, liimper{t, ManganI, West,
<br />Mre West moved that ?hc-, Law Director be requested tu draw up the necessary
<br />legislation to autfiorize membersh%p in the Rega.onal Planning Commission,
<br />Motion was seconded by Mr, Limperto °"YeaseP Caster, F'cltzp H-?,dgins, Leonarde
<br />? Zimpert9 Mangani, Westo
|