|
Ja: uary 5, 1965 - Page 3
<br />T'he px°oblem of the type :)fstorm sewer connections t3 fie used in Brett.on Ridge
<br />Nos. lA 2 and 3 has been resc1ved. The Engineer's report on the Rose Tr°ee
<br />and Candlel"Lght Subdivision? stiows many correcti«ns to be mad?, The Engineer
<br />also has furnished thp- Commi,!tteE with a new set of st.andards for street anci
<br />highway
<br />Mr, West,in'hairanian of ??e Finance Cummittee, reported that tney met and reviewed
<br />Gity expenses for 1964, and then reviewed the proposed budget for the first
<br />quarter of 1965, It haE been decided to carry over the sma11 amount df money
<br />left overz in 1964, to take ?,are of expenses in 1965, sin,s.e there is some question
<br />of how much money we wi1Y get. when fram the County in 1965e
<br />Mr, Manganb, Chairman cf the City Planning Co¢`mittee, referred to the Committee
<br />report at the December 1.5th C'ounczl meeting, with reg?rd to the preliminary
<br />on Sandy Ridge, T'h? Cc,,mmittee was uznaware at that_ time that the money had
<br />been deposited, and M?, Mangani requested t1??t t,'ne rercrd ?h:?w that trsnight
<br />a motion wiYl be made f(:r approval,
<br />Mr. Mangani then moved, s?conded by Mro West tha? Council approve the pre-
<br />liminary plaf of Sandy Rielge Developme.nt. Motion was seconded by Ma-. Weste
<br />"Yeas`° Caster, Foltz, Hodgins, Leanard, Limpert, Mangani, West.
<br />He reported that two hi-r?se buildiatgs are under consideratx_on by the Ci1ty
<br />Planning Committee, on? submittted by Spark,y DiBenedetto at C,olumbia and
<br />Kennedy Ridge, and the other submitted by Mr. Nudelman of Matherson Builders
<br />at 23560 I.Forain Road, Bath have taeen appreved by the Planni.ng Commission,
<br />Ordinance Noe 64-248 was held 'back because of on?? ????,-,)t at Glague and Delmere
<br />on wttich rezoning was requested- Mr, Manganf reported tnat. the slevelapers ha4e
<br />restxbmitte,d their requevt f?? rezcsning to two-family, omitting Sublmt lYoa 1,
<br />and asking onlg for rezoning of four sublot.s on De.lmere. 'I'he Cz+ry Planning
<br />Committee recommends approval,
<br />Mr. Mangani tfien moverl that the plat requ?sting rezoning of four sublots an
<br />Delmere to ti.ro-f amiYy eiwe 11 ings be approved. Motion was seconded tay Mrs.
<br />Hodgins. °°Yeas`° Caster, Foltz, Hoclgins,Leonard, Limpert, Mamgani, Weste
<br />Mr. Mangani reported tl?? City Planning Comnittee m?t. with the Schacrl Board
<br />on the first cluster zoning. In th?s first attempt, some errors were, made,
<br />but the objectives Frere ac.hieved. Elowever, the Committee plans on an early
<br />meeting wYth the Sch(oal Board t:o go aver the methodtD be rxsecl in transferring
<br />proper°ties that accrue from 6'1?dster° Zoning in the future.
<br />Mr. Mangan? then set a m?eting c:f the City Flanning Gommittee Thua sday, Januay
<br />7tfi aft.ex° the specia1 ci_.un.m.ul meet ing.
<br />Mr. Mangan; s1so ca11ed attentiom to a list of twenty-five major items whi.ch
<br />caere l.isted f?? ?ounck,Yfs r:cnsideration at the beginning of 1964, of which
<br />twentymtwo had shown reau1ts.
<br />Mro C. 0. Fisher appsated tP-fore Cayunci1 in ??onnecltion with North ParLc Sw.b-
<br />division No, Y, and the delay in the arceptance by the Council for dedication,
<br />on whicn there was -on6iderable d??cussiona Mr. Fisher also askesi for
<br />? infortnati,ort on the rat,?? r?:quirements established in crnnection with acceptance
<br />of the treatment p1ant.
|