05/21/1968 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Councdl Monutes 5-29m68 T5m Resoluxa,on No. 68-88 was ontrodvced by Mr, Prokasy. AResolutoon ac- ceptang for record purposes only Red Coach Subdav8suon No> l, and rem pealeng 66-li98 ane declaring an emergency. Mre Prokasy then moved for suspensuon of the ru1e requerong three separate readings, seconded by Mr. Caster> Af#urmateve vote Caster9 Esan, Hodgunse Lumpert9 Msller9 Prokasy9 West. Mr. Prokasy moved foir admptcon of the Resolum tion9 sec????? ?y Mso Castere Afformat6ve vote Caster9 Eian9 HodgAnsa Lompert9 M0ller9 Prokazy9 Weste Resolutmon No. 68-89 waE antroduced by Mr. Prokasy. A Resoluteon aum thorizsng the Mayor to negotoate wath the owners of t?e real estate known as Permanent Parcel Nm. 234m22m22a and Permanent Parcel Noe 234m22-239 and declarong aw arnergency. Mr. Prokasy u?oved for the sus- pensio? ?? the rule requareng three separate readongs9 seconded by Mr. Caster. Affol-matAve voge Caster, Esan, Hodgins9 Limpert9 Molder, Pro- kasy, West. Mro Prokasy then moved for adnpition of the Re.?olutaon9 seconded by Mro Castere AffirmatAve vote Caster9 E9an9 Hodgons9 Lampert, Miller9 Prokasy9 We?t. Old busonesse Mr. Ma1ler saud he feels there are stala questaons to be answered regardong Cflty Engoneer Dutton's report mn the Eicher property and the prob?ems. After a lengthy doscussion9 concensus was ghat Councvi should take very defanite steps to immediately correct condatson9 although both Mr. Dutton and Law Dorector Katchen sa¢d property owner also has a responsubele?? in this case mto breng suut agaenst the bualdec. Mr. Caster saed he felt Mu??l v- Co, should be stopped right now from doing any further work an North 91msted until this pcoperty is taken care of properlyy, and Mro Msller agreed, askang what legal means we have for gettang problem taken care of wsthout further delay. Mr. Kitchen sasd we can impmse a penalty fine of $500 a day agaunst house movers for veolatong house moving requorements on the Eacher property9 since accordang to our engineer°s re- port Mural and Coo moved the house wethout a permot and set at on an imm properly constructed foundataon (Ord. No. 65-221, 10m19-65). Mro Dutton again revaewed what had occured recently (refer to h6s reporfi memo on Eicher property mf May 2lst). Engineering is now awaiting unformation from Mural and Cm. aJ to what they propose to do to correct situataon> He said at thus poont the only aiternateve is to proceed enforcang the ordanance for penaltye Onye agayn, the concensus seemed to be that Mural & Co, should put in the basement TMhe way et was supposed to be9 and sance this setuation has beero goong on s???e Ocgober 1967 Council feeldng is that et must do any- theng in ats power to aad in seeong thas problem is so?ved as queckYy as possib?eo Councau then d6rected Safety Service Durector Lompert to have Mural F, Co, stop al? other work 'In North Olffisted and correct the satuation on Eicher property. Mu??l E., Co. is to be fened $500.00 aday penalty for each day untel situasoon is taken care of (Ord. No0 65-221, 10m19-65). Mr. West asked Mr. Dutton about progress as to drainage in Bretton Ridge area, also as to what had occurred recently durang severe storm. Mr. Dutton said engsneerong is sausfoed woth drainage situataon in Bretton Ridge and is workang cAosely wpt? Mro Reskand on problemso Work is to be completed as soon as weather wull permet, under engoneprang's directoonsa Eurther dis- cussion f???owed in regard to ditches, swales and stmrm sewers.