Council Minuces 4-i5-69 -2-
<br />motion, "Yeas" castez, EYdn, Hodgins, Nlillex, 'Prokasy, West- Cvinmittee ?-has approved Lhe G1ingmdn Subdivision of 8 sub-1ots, off Martin Drive,
<br />They have recommendations from Planning Commission for a mixed multi-family
<br />ordinance, exr.ension )i BYOC;kpark Road, and the Lorain Road re-zoning proposal,
<br />which the Council wili now consider in ?ommitLee_ There have been requests to
<br />place this iSSUE on ehe balY?c and there is no objection to this, but Council
<br />does noL have such auLt-,ie:icy YL. must be done either by initiative or refeY-
<br />endum praceedingb
<br />President U'Neiiti read a lEtxer fiom Mr Joseph Leithold regarding awards
<br />received by f3ux fSoy Sc„uL,, Ln Norrh Olmsted.
<br />The following people addte55ed Coun:,il:
<br />Mro Joseph Zahlet, 4'4$1 West kanchview, questioned specifications required
<br />foi connecting inro 5aniLary sewers - asked if all homes have to conform to
<br />this code: Mayox C1ip:i,,cf¢aci ec-plied hat in 1962 they did not but because of
<br />trouble we have chdnged mechud
<br />Mr, Henry Itossen, 452; Wesc RanLhvIew, feels it is unnecessary to go to all
<br />this expense when chey ate r.iuL having trUUblE, and pipes were approved by
<br />City inspECtors when hou5es wes,_ bui1G- .
<br />?
<br />Mr. Thomas Boyle, .452?+ Weut. Ranchv:r.ew, agreed wich neighbors who had already
<br />spoken, He does not see any neces5ity ior making change in pipes.
<br />Mr, joseph Gados, 449i We6L kan,h?iew, also agreed that there was no need to
<br />go to this expense siri?i-_- this was done acc:ording to Code at time homes were
<br />built,
<br />Mr, .Yohn Kirk, 448$ Wesc Rdn, hview, mencioned they can't even find people
<br />interested in qucrting on chese jobs He iinally got one man to quote a
<br />price of around $3,000, which he tElt was unreasonable,
<br />Mr, Zahler quescionEd chE aizterence in pipe Lhac is being used now.
<br />Discussion follawed fln smukt test., ics merits, and residencs were urged
<br />to have this Lest made ii they te1G ?hcir pipe was safe to use,
<br />Mr- Waltet till.en, 503 38 iorain ftodd, acldtessed che Mayor on the Lorain Road
<br />re-zoning question
<br />Mr, Emil V1aci, $30 Leader Iiictg ,asked when Voruncil passed resoLution author-
<br />izing Regional Planning Gun?missi?;n ca make ti?is study, He said he wou_ld like
<br />copy of samE Pcesident 0'NEill saict chiS ?.au1d be obtained any day at Lhe
<br />Gity Hall
<br />Resolucion No 69-5#s whic.h hdd beEn introduced by Mrm Prokasy, was given
<br />its third reading, "A Resoi+tion auLhorizing [he Mayor to contract with
<br />the Regivnal Planning t,ommission " Mi: Prakasy moved foY adoption of
<br />Resolutionx see:onded by N1i vaster- Affirmacive vote CasLer, Hodgins,
<br />Mi11er, Pr3kasy, Wesc Negar ive voLe Eiacx
<br />Ordinance Nc- 69-93, YnzroduLed by Mr. Eian, was given its first readinge
<br />"An Ordinance authozizing the Buil.ding i,ommissioner to proceed with Lhe
<br />demolition or remcval ot th. dweilings on Permanent Parcel Nos. 237-23-4
<br />;_ ..
|