Laserfiche WebLink
Coeuicil Minutes of 10-24-70 ---- Page -8- <br />Mr. Karhaa said there is only a 12 inch sewer gaing north on Hawt4n and <br />this can anly take sbaut 1 cu.ft. per second of water, and his calcula- <br />tions ahcw that the schoal wvuld be puttiag in ebout 13 cu.ft. per second <br />cf water, so thay have to xitWold at 1eest 12 cu. ft. per secand, sad this <br />is what he wants to msks certain ie comcted and taken care of before he <br />agrees to the site pZan. <br />Mr. West atated this fs very iaportant, ber.ause if you gut up a build3ag <br />and the site is aot in auccordsnce with the desfgu anrl retentiaa baaisi, <br />geople are getting wates. Zhat i.s the reason it ia being held up and es <br />far as he is crncerned, unlless the Engineeriag Department ger.e more infor- <br />mation, he wi21 wait umtil we got a desiga on a reteattan basin that will <br />&.eep that ares from fluoding. P'urther, it is tatallp unfair to fihe peaple <br />araund there to have Settffert budlding aud guttimg up samthin$ that is <br />going to create a water problsm for them when, ia fact, it caie be taken <br />care of beforehand. <br />Mr. Klein stated he is in a posfticn of being in a public bidding prapasi- <br />tion and were ati+ardsd the cantract to start within 30 days. A1so, if this <br />isn't possible there wilI be add#tiaaal costs, etc. Alao construction <br />weather isn't in January - it ia September and Qctober. <br />Mr. West comanented Mr. Kle#n must have had a layout in mind when he bid <br />on it; sug$ested giving sawe to Engineering Uepartraent. Mr. Klein said <br />Engineering had it fvr three weeks and asked if Erigineeriag Departsent <br />would issue a letter stating prablema. <br />Mr. Karhan stated same was turned back to 5euffert aad requested them to <br />came up with a suitable way of getting rid of the water. Another thing, <br />Mx. Karhan stated, is that the drewi.ngs were semt out be£ore thep xere <br />approved, and people bid on it before they had approved draswiiaga. It is <br />not Mr. Rarhan's problem to turn around and deaign retenticrn basia for the <br />architect. The arahitect is being paid a hanclsome sum by the School Board <br />and it is his duty t4 sake the clesign, and if the design is auitable, Mr. <br />Karhan said his Department wi11 apprave it. Further, a 2ett+er has been <br />seat to the Bu3lding Ccmissianer stating reasons why this has not been <br />agproved. Also, Mr. Seuffert was in Mr. Karhan's office three weetcs ago <br />and was told then what the problem was. <br />Mr. Klein asked if he is to undsrstand that there will be nq buildfng permit <br />issued until the site drainage is corrected or re-engiaaqexsd? <br />Mr. Karhan stated he wi12 not spprove it until same is eorrected or re- <br />engineersd to the satisfaction of his Department. <br />President 0'Nei1Z recapped that problem was pointed out to Mr. Seuffert <br />soaietim ago and if he wants saw in the form of a letter, Mr. RoThM <br />will ablfge. In the meanti.ae, it is up to Mr. Klei.n to get his architect <br />to redesign aad comply with the Bngfnearing Uepartaent. DiscuWsion <br />cantinued with Mayor thristow stating that Mr. Klein, as agmt fax <br />Seuffert, is the one that haa to sstisfy the City on drainsge. IC would <br />behoove Mr. Rlein to gut pressure on the architect. The objecticrns have <br />heen noted in writing.