11/18/1975 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Minutes of 11-18-75 -2_ Committee the possibility to consider advertising for bids far solid waste disposal fees. City 8ngiaeer Childs reported: 3) receivai notice last weak from the E.P.A. that they have approved the design of the water main for City Lim 9nbdivision. Mrs. Beringer asked Service Director Caster if there is any piblaity of hiring a full time Dog. Warden as a part tea pt~ition is very ineffective. 1-fr. Caster explained the situation sad reason wtt~r he is asking for coaalerattoa to establish two part time positions and Mesa two people would be oa call. Law Director Gateau reported: 1) The Court of Catsawoa Pleas is the case of Burkett, et a1. vs. City of North Olssted, et al., cosmonly knaten as the gags F'2asat suit, overruled the City's Nation to aiatfss the case, which in effect rewires the City to ffle as answer. An svelter will be filed on behalf of thin City prior to ~c+reber 1, 1975. goinwr, at the tics of the tiling of aaa answer in ay ~udg~srtt it will be necessary to include the etagiitresrt~ firs of Floyd Brosne & ~Araociates as an additional party defendant. It is tie position of the Lair Dsprtroctm~t that both Ziaspro and Floyd Browne. era isd~a].e parties, and 1f thence is any 1iAbility because of defects is dasga, liability wouald presumably rest with either Zmpro or Floyd Browne; 2) During tax collection tine of ewsy year, any property oir~rr say file an action with the Board of Revision to haw t~ asrwrsse,d vali~tro of his pre~rty decreased. It should also be pointed out that during that sssale period of ti~a, either the City or the School Hoard arty seek increases in Wised wtuation. Prior to this ties, wra have followed a pr~ras of contaits~tt, sertking to subttit evidence attuking the credita~-ility of the evdeatca subsi.tted by Ceargs~srciai and Multi-Penally property onrners. 'ii'th th;ls type of progr~t, ws are ~t coansidersd to be a real party in interest, and sa con~uently, we were prohibited from appealing any decision which was adverse to our interest. By the next Co?Rmcil meeting, I will. present to Coil a progrsaaa v~&ereby the City's interest as well as the School Board's will be prvte+ctsd to the eactent that the City and the Board will have a right of appral frith reset to any adverse decision. At that tiaee, I will seek Cov~eil's approval to e~erk upon this program; 3) Oa the 12th of r, 19711, Gia~c Chrysler Ply~nth appeared bye the Board of Zoning typpeals for Hatt pvrpsa~+t of obtaining a vaxiae for the. twnfie of sutos+obiles within the Sfl foot set~rack. I hed an opportunity to sacgue the case before the Board of Zoning Appeals aw the Board refused to great a vari~c:. As of yet, I have had no i>odicatiann that that decision will be app!sal.ed. Mrs. Beringer, Chairman Bavirtal Control Committee sad Long Range Flazanti>~g Committee, reported: 1) Bnvr tal Cos~trc~l ComsAttee set crn fiber 12, 1975. Meeting was set up to meet with officials of Bay Village acid West2~tk+e to disctnss the problem of storm- water transportation. Noirewr, t~stlake dial riot ,tbaor up for the meeting as they previously stste~ soa~tson+t would be there, lttyor Rres+t of Bay village was also is attendance. Mars. Beringer reported shoot ache a~rssilability of a grant from the Soil and Water Coat~seairiratioa Cossission which could '~- pursued by a petition for said grant via Section 1515.16 4bio B+evised Code. In speakiarng to Senator Steno was inforsed this art t would be easier achieved i# S.B. 334 bewares law. Will ask the Clerk of Council to acquire a copy of this bill to review before asking for legislation s+r#pponcting said bill. A msetisag will be set up at the end of Novesber idiere Mac. Aobart W. Tester, Director of Ohio Hegt. of Natural Resourves will meet with us sad Westlake and Bap Village to discuss this grograffi further;