Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutea of 1/15/80 -5- <br />2) Comsittse discusaed this, t+estaaack 13evelopsant Cvmpsny, Resubd#viaim N0 2, of <br />sublots 24 aad 21. Coemittae has no abjactiou. Legislation ia cm #irst reading <br />toni.gtit. <br />3) Ccm3.ttre discussed the prelia?nary plsns far 7515 Company, SuWvision No. 29 <br />which ia a proposed developrsmt smth of t'iosr Field ife"lopme" ofi W*Itsz lead and <br />off of Colvmbia Road. Comittee wi11 rstain th1s for further cmt#ftrattocc due to <br />a caaccra !or ingress and egress. <br />PresideAt Limgert asked if thera hac1 1een mt;y diacuaalon in Coamittss iri.th regard to <br />the developmaat off of Elx lAad. Mar. Lagan replied that it had beera di:scw"ed last <br />yeaz and Oas stil.l in Camittee. <br />Mr. 6laerp*l, Chairman 1`xan"Ortation Casimittee reportod: 1) Comi.ttee wat on <br />January 14th to discuss speei#icolly ftd'l No. 79-176, aa amendei. Comaittee has <br />no objectioa to this ordinance whtth fs Qn recovA reotting toaight. <br />2) Cowni.ttese also received iasf4xiat3on fxm the AdWnistratfve A"3strat af the <br />North t31imted Municipal Bua Li.ma, Mr. Tpm Tttbradiri and Cdmdtteo wi11 b+e awting agsin <br />Co discuss this inforiaation eAd tto concams of the smplayeea in greater detail. <br />Letters atxl Coaamnications: <br />Clerk ragorted receipt of two lettera fras the Ohio Depsrtment ot Trensportution; <br />one fram Director David L. Weir snd one fsm IIeputy Director Tboo" M. Krall, Both <br />letters st.ate that ODOT hae rio iutentira of evoctiug a aoise barrier at Lacstion 13 <br />along I-480. Copiee of both letters atiare forwt=ded to Council. <br />People sddresaing Council: <br />Gabe Delloasta, Chairma, 1+#egotiattng C.oamtittee for the North Olmted Police De- <br />partuout: Iu mid-Uctabtr, repremmtative+r for the City and members of the Palice <br />Negotiatiag Co¦a3ttee began negotiatioaas, Palice Dspsrtmwent' a arigi"l propc:aal <br />consisted of a 172 increase the first gear, 152 incritaae the sacmil y"r and <br />additional beaefits. City raptasentstivet• posltian waa an offer caf 32 the fi.rst <br />qear aad 4.5% the second gsar, aith Qrovisitns to tslce away five benefitr vhich were <br />previovslq negottated in the past yeaxs, Plw the requiremeat €or ghysfcal sxawin- <br />ations every year at officer's expenee by a dc?ctor of the Admtaistration's cho3ce, <br />aad that tbose officera wtrc do mot live vftbiu the City do so. Poiica uagotiators <br />were forced to reaegotiate benafits alrr?ady acqufrad, Zeavi.ng the only thing <br />negotiablee a salsry increase - Polics EMtpartumt xaquaating a 92 firet ysar and an <br />8.5% sacond yesr increase. City rsprssontativ+es indicated their final offar was <br />6.2% and 6% rsspectivelq. Present eltuation standa wiCh both aidas st aa ie"sse. <br />Mr. Dellapaets's report cont3nued. <br />Fraalc Finkham, 6595 Barton &Aad: Psrsit waa issued by Buildiag DapartmenC for a <br />housmm to be huilt next to b-is grvpearty; garsge doors are facing bts bedra?on wiudaws• <br />Cars are parked under his badroom windaws aetd the+re is vuch noisa, fures, etc. <br />He hss twice applied for a privacy featce te eliuinate the naise attd ma refused an • <br />both occasione. A aew drivexag waa aleo inrtal.led an thia prcparty cauaing draiaa8e <br />onto his property. Diacuasiau cautinuad. Ccuncilman Logan scheduled a 8ZD Comittee <br />Meeting for Saturday morntng at ten c'clock at Mr. Finkham's howe and raquested <br />Building Caodissioner Gundy and Mr. Patttn to be in attentlance to inv+estigate the <br />ecmplaint. Mr. Wilamosky reqwested the ftgtineeri.og Uepartaent tc pravid+s ecmreittee <br />with in€ormation with respect to the drai"ge prcblem described by Mr. Pfukbm <br />prior to this Saturday meetiag.