|
Council TMif.nut f• s of 12I15 /"I.
<br />_2_
<br />3) "',ith resnect to Our Ganfy, Lokn?e, a hsarina is schedulecl for npceq-)er 22nd and
<br />Lw•7 Di.rector is nreser.tly lininQ1 up ,?ritnesses and preparin? arpumer,ts i?7%y their
<br />license should not be renecaed.
<br />4) T!ze prope'cty next to Fire Station Tio. 1 T,vas acauire4 hy the City on ??ecemher 2nd,
<br />1981. City paid $45,071- $513.41 of iahich was returneti. Law Director 'ias given
<br />a chec?; in this amot:nt to Finance nirector nrockman toniaht.
<br />Swfety nirectoi ?'etre reported: 1) This nast wee1=y Commiss3onQr Gurt4v, Fire ChiPf
<br />Van':uren and Safiety D-3rector attendad a?neetinq at the Interoretive CentPr -?ith
<br />Board "iembers of rietro °arl: and interested citi7ens. Coixncil hag recPi.ved a renart,
<br />cmmmiled hv ''r. Reese o£ the 'letx•o Pa& Svstem, on a study of Fort ?Till whic'A eon-
<br />cluded that a wooden puard ra:!1 along the rim be exnan3ed, usin_!? three-raj.l, spiit
<br />fence, as T•Yeli as aiQnage reinforcesnent. In addition, the tv'o unofficial paths a; both
<br />ends of the nlateau will be fmnroved wit'i a split rail fence alonf- ik*tih steps leadin(?
<br />to the plateau from both eitds. Recommanclatione for the trsil improvements, it is
<br />felt hv the '•f.etro Park Systems, can be implemented durinp the next construction
<br />season with the acidit3onal railing on ton of the nlateau Co be inStal.led immedi3tely.
<br />'?rs. Saring.er, Chairman Streets ard DrainaQe Committee and Intra-Govern*ncntAl Re-
<br />lations and Lerislation CommitteQ rsported^ 1) Legislation Co!?*?ittee rnet on
<br />Decemher 7th, 1481, and discussed Ozdinance 'Io. g1-140, on second readina., a resolu-
<br />tion onnasing the increases in rates for 0'.FYO Bell_ Telen'ione Colpany now pending before
<br />the PUCO. Co*.mittee has no o'b1ection.
<br />2) Committee discuased Ordinanee '.do. 81-138, on secon3 readinry, ur(?ins?, the Ohio
<br />General Assembly to support SenaCe Joint ^Asolutian 33, callinR for an imriediate
<br />nuclear weanons £reeze hy t!ie iJS and t'le USST'. Camm3ttee has no obieetion.
<br />3) Gor.tmittee discusaed ')rdinance "?o, 81-135, an ordinance estahlis'lin4 a ne?,*
<br />Seetion 117.14 of t'ie Codified Ordinances entitled "?'rocedure ?1YSon C?iarpe Of Conflict
<br />Of Interest -7stablishment of TChics Cor.imi.ssion" of Chanter 117 entitleil ''Code o£
<br />Ethics"> Committee caas suppoLtive of this ordin4nce 'ioeaever sam? c'zano,es s'zou13 he
<br />r.iade ani *aoXked Out. One amendr.ient alreacly made wa3 in Section 107.14, Spction (a),
<br />after 'one (1) 7•'ard Cauncilman'`, insert "neither of r4hich are of the same nolitical
<br />Aarty unless all members are of the satne nolitical party.'' Committee tai11 continue
<br />to revieT,7 this ordinance at piher Lecrislation "teetings. ?lr. .Logan *.noved and it ?-7as
<br />seconded that a11 of CcunCil decide the matter of t?r. `?oernel's canduct and *,hether or
<br />not anv aetion saill be taken, Unon Mxs. Petri-ac's supgestion, any motian to be
<br />made ciealing with this matter in the future, shall be in writinn, and included in
<br />the legis2atipn packet for *Thatever Council "?eeting a:; ?4hft%K3 -A:.c,: be' 4f.ocussed.
<br />4) Mrs. Sarinier requested a resoluCion oppooing thR budget cuts at NASA snd Committee
<br />has no objection. This is on tonip?ht's agenda and wi11 be as'.tnv. for suspension of
<br />the rule requirinQ three readings.
<br />5) SCreets and DrainaQe Committee riet briefly and. discusseA Ord3nance 'Mo. 81-127 anc?
<br />81-128 ciealin¢ with Dover Center and ClaQUe Roads. Committee has no objection.
<br />'trs. Per,rigac stated that she ?•ioul.J like to correct the I.e^,islative °.enort and also
<br />add somethin-I to it. First of all, as xePOrted out it is incorrect. "qr. Logan,
<br />by motion, with the unanimous anreement of the Legislati.on Cor.unittee, Tias to have
<br />in t'ie nackets on Friday, Decemher 11t`x, a motion in reQard to disposin7 of the
<br />charF!es against Council!nan "?oervel. ?:n vie=T of the fact t'zat there 7-7as no motion
<br />in the packets; there is no Motion on the floor from TRr. Lo4an! then ATrs. PetriQac
<br />moved that all charges concerning Councilman `Joernel be droPnea, seconded bv
<br />".r. T,'oerpel.
<br />? Mrs. Saringer stated that tk!ere must be a misun4erstandi.ngo It was her under-
<br />standing o£ the motion made '-)y 'xr. Loryan that °'when" he woul-i make a moticn with
<br />rasnect to anv action to be tnken, "thenifi would he delivPred to Council., in
<br />wrttinp, heforehand. There was no sraecific note that it i,7as to be Eor thi q
<br />Council iteeti.rtg of DeCembBr 15, 1981.
|