My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/20/1982 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1982
>
07/20/1982 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2014 3:59:56 PM
Creation date
1/3/2014 10:35:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
7/20/1982
Year
1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Couacil Minutes of 7I20i82 '3' <br />permissioa to enter a limited access higtway - Brook;_)ark Road. If the 3tate appravea <br />then the City would seek fuading, passibly Countp 50% participa!:!.? ftutdtus. If the <br />State does not aporove, the entire canception is moot. Mr. I.ogau maved Ca+?ci1 direct <br />the City Bagiaeer to fozmlly raquest the Sate of th3.o to allaw for the intaraection <br />of the proposed Cantethury Road fttemion into Brockpark Rc?ad, Stste R+oute 17, <br />seconded by Mrs. Petrigac, imaalma!tisly appravped. <br />5) Coimnittee requested City laglmet 9Gutromki to furW.sh s list af tany s#.gnsl.iaed <br />intersection volations of th,e tlhio Nowi;atl an Mdfo°rm Traffic Control Dewices. If <br />there are a:ry euch v3olatione, City Ingln"x wiil ctm@ile aliat anH for+?ard, it to <br />Com:nittee, which in turn wiil send 1C to a1.1 Members of Cca?uaci3. <br />Mra. Petrig;ac, Chairm:n Loag Ramge P1em.i.ng CAww,ittae reported: 1) Although Committee <br />was present, due Co the lsngth of the Transportst3onComeittae Meetiffig ae test re- <br />ported by Chai.rnwn LQBan, Lau8 lo? Plam#ng Committee did not actwtlly sreot per se. <br />Briefly discusssd all ttie informCirn voice#.'ved reggsding a C ty Dtvel t <br />Corporation aad the poea#.bility of farid.ng one in porth 0].mted. Casrtittee wi.ll ueet <br />aad have an in-depth d3.scussirnt. <br />Mrs. Sariager, Chairmn Iatra-Covsramental Relatione aud Ls9"latiou Camitts?e rtported: <br />1) Comi.ttee met on 3ulp 13th x3th all aembar: pressat as well as aLl mambess af Couacil <br />with the excs?ption of Presldes?t Doeboer. Also ia attondaac:e was Finamce Director Boql.e. <br />Comnittee had p],anaeEd an iatarviswi:r4 Dr. PttiUp Huf'fman segatrdi,ng an aMmiatsoent ta the <br />Civil Serviee Comissioa hawomr Br. F?ffmstt aas unavailatble. A fuCute, mutuslly <br />suitable neetiag wl21 be arr . <br />2) Camtaittee discusssd Ordinance So. 92-87 regarcling drug parapheanaalia and has no <br />abjection but wauld like to momA the crr+itnance to rtqui.re prtaper idenfiificaticn. <br />Mre. Saringer moved to aowd O"inawe No. 82-87 to rtol in Secticn 753.09, Records <br />and Inspectian, first paraoraph, ae+esced sentmee, after "naae and address af the <br />purchaser" inssrt "aad the p"per identii`ication be required at the tiae o;E purchase", <br />aeconded bq Mr. WilamoslCy. ia#telc wch discusion as to what ccmatitutsd "proper" <br />identificatian, Mrs. Sarisoz withdrenr her notien snd ft. Wilaatos3ry wlthdteRr his secoad. <br />Ordinance No. 82-87 will stsgr io cowdttea !`ar further discussion aad reri.a?. <br />3) Committee also discueeed {rdfnancR Nc?. 82-$8 atad had na objsctiaott, tore"r w311 have <br />another meeting on this to go"?ly eaepmd the ordiaamcie to inc].ude ctther vehicles sa <br />well as trucks. <br />Mr. Woerpel, Chairman Builctfng, ?onins =4 Deo-Ve3:c?Pumt comi.ttoe repottod; i) t#rdi.nanc€ <br />No. 82-89 and No. 82 90 aere remmW :? the afgada becawre the BZD C.+01wd.Et+te will be <br />neetietg on Thursday, Julp 22od, to dl.acu" t1an. At the laet Cameil Wasti.ng, <br />Mrs. Saringer asked if the City would in sny wey be liable or responrible tos the <br />$52,000 fram the Capita]. Inpsavemat Ftimd ior the agreamut with Al1rxander Zmas+eff to <br />perforin prelini.nary enginseriag to construct tha raadrray. Mx. Woeqwl answexe$ at <br />that tima that to hia knowledge the City wou1d not be liable's that #* any event, that <br />meney would be paid back to the City by the benefitting pr"erty twtlMerat. SiAeze tbon, <br />Mr. Woerpel has learned that this, i.a fact, map aot be the caso aaa4d would iiks to <br />alert Couacil to this. There arve tbmt arlternot9.ws. Oae, if the comes <br />in within estimated gui4allpas and Cbay ga sheod and pr4ceod w3.tI1 the tcrCal pvroject, <br />the nwney wiil be aesess" the proprty mmers and it wtil not ccst the City aap wouey. <br />1tao, if the preliminaty au+d the esti"tes c+ame in abme ISX of anCi,cipated <br />costs and it is not geateible far tbAsia tc proceed, the cost af enginsoaring, $52.004, <br />will be assessed them and returned to tbe Cftg. Third, if the ettg"+s?g and the <br />road come in within the aucgected financial Wide litea aad the d+ewloiers are ready <br />to proceed but for some reagon Camci1 4oas not ses f it to reao,e the particul8r <br />parcela to Limited Iadvstry, thsy wrould nat necersssstily Faj? fvr the eost 1aocause it <br />would be an actlon of Comcil wIti.Ch axmdd prob3.bit them.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.