Laserfiche WebLink
w <br />. Minutes of Public Hearing 11/15/88 -5- <br />Residence C District to Office Building District and further from certain <br />premises hereinafter described from Multiple Residence District to Office <br />Building District. Mr. Tallon have you had this in your committee, sir? <br />Tallon: Yes. <br />Beringer: Is there anything you would like to point out to council in regards <br />to this pending legislation? <br />Tallon: No. Just to let everybody know that this is the. property on the north <br />side of-Brookpark, between Columbia and Great Northern Boulevard and it is being <br />rezoned to the new Office Buildic~ District and-from the existing multi-family <br />and single family Class C Residence. <br />Beringer: Is there anyone in ttie audience that would like to address Council on <br />this legislation? <br />Angelo Skoulis, 24732 Mitchell Drive. I am President of Parkwest Homeowners' <br />Association and one of the members of the Board of Trustees. I live at 24732 <br />Mitchell Drive. As council members are aware, we have had a number of meetings <br />with the developers representatives, at their request. They had. asked us back <br />in April to start havr-g meetings with them to see. if we couldn't work something <br />out that would be satisfactory to both sides and over the past several months <br />we have been able to work out an agrent; the builder stuck to his word; allowed <br />us to have quite a bit of input; made a number of concessions and we did come up <br />with an agreement that's agreeable to bath sides. So,.with council's permission, <br />I would like to have the builder's representative read off that list of con- <br />cessions that they are willing to make for our development so that it becomes <br />part of the official record; sca that at some future date, there won't be any <br />arguements as to who said what and what was promised to whom. We have been here <br />at~:a number of council.~eting.s and have seen people arguing over and-over and <br />over again what the develo~rer had prised them and what was said and so €orth <br />and so on. So, if council is williaig, and the developer's representative is <br />ready, I would like to .ask his to get up and mead off the fist of concessions <br />that they are willing to make on this project. Is it all night with Council? <br />Beringer: Mr. Carlisle, is this agreeable to you? Ar_e you pxepared to handle <br />it in this order? Do you wart to read tla+~a off or do yrsu have something you <br />could submit to us for the Clerk to put in the record. <br />Carlisle: Right now I am prepared to read-them off; I don't have anything (to <br />submit). <br />Beringer: Fine. <br />Richard Carlisle: My name is Richard Carlisle; I represent Biskind Development. <br />Here also tonight is ~y Watts and Mitchell Mize, both also with Biskind Develop- <br />ment. As Mr. Skoulis had indicated, we've been through a long process, going <br />all the way back to March or April a~ad we did bring our whole dvg and pony show, <br />with all the boards and graphs and everything, so if there are any particular <br />questions that.are in the council's mind we can address those. I think a great <br />many of you have already heard a lot of that so I don't intend to go through <br />that. I would like to hit the high points which essentially focus around what <br />we have come to an agreement with with our neighbors, principally the Parkwest <br />Homeowners' Association. The landscape buffer is one of the largest issues that <br />we came upon and as you are probably all aware, we actually built a landscape <br />buffer on our property, behind the resideinces that,as an example we worked through <br />that with them and created a buffer and the parameters of that buffer are that <br />it is to be a minimum of 50 feet between our buffer area, from all residential <br /> <br />