Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council Minutes of 10/4/88 _6_ <br />Mr. Wilamosky asked to be recognized; President Saringer stated it was <br />time for Finance Director Boyle's report since he was now in attendance. <br />~' Mr. Wilamosky challenged the decision of the Chair, second by Mr. McKay. <br />Roll call on motion: Affirmative vote: Boehmer, McKay, Tallon, Wilamosky. <br />Negative vote: Bahas, O'Grady. 4 Aye - 2 Nay - Motion carried. <br />The Chair recognized Mr. Wilamosky. Mr. Wilamosky stated that he felt Mrs. <br />Bahas answered her own question by saying this legislation is really not <br />relative and therefore does not know why it would. be retained in committee. <br />If it has no bearing on Crocker/Steams, let it be brought out, dealt with, <br />and not buried in committee. When-will it be dealt with? A week before <br />the election or a week after? <br />Finance Director Boyle reported: 1) Apologized for being late and missing the <br />caucus session. With respect to the legislation on Maple Ridge Road, council <br />has already passed an ordinance covering $30,000 of that for. the city's share. <br />This legislation tonight is to cover the paperwork for receiving the $30,000 <br />from Westlake for their share and to show how it will be dispensed; it will <br />receive the money into the General Fund and then be appropriated for Maple <br />Ridge Road construction so in the future no one will be under the assumption <br />that it was a $30,000 project when it was actually a $60,000 project. <br />2) With respect to Mr. Wilamosky's report on the sewer billing, this billing is <br />based on estimated costs. After completing 1989, financial statements will be <br />finalized and actual costs verified. An adjustment will then be made on the May <br />billing to the Township: if the estimates were low, the rates will be higher in <br />r1ay; if the estimates were high, the rates will be lower in May. The May <br />billing will also be the new rate they receive, based on the 1989 estimates, so <br />there is no chance they will not pay their fair share of the cost of wastewater <br />treatment. <br />3) Has been asked what the past dry summer did as far as water consumption. The <br />Cleveland statement shows North Olmsted consumed 52,000 MCF's; normal consumption <br />is about 42,000 MCF's so consumption was up on an average of 1 MCF per household. <br />Basically this was used for showers and clothes washing so it did not impact on <br />the Wastewater Treatment Plant and its expenses. <br />4) The Deferred Compensation Plan has been taken over by the Public Employees' <br />Retirement System. Has just received the report for the first part of 1988 and <br />the city's liability to Deferred Compensation, which is on deposit with the PERS, <br />is $1,664,850. <br />5) There are presently two bills in Congress to correct the Tax Reform Act of <br />1986. Several things in these bills have .been discussed in the past - investing <br />bond money, note money, etc. There is also something in there .that. says any <br />benefit an employee receives is taxable when he receives the benefit. An employee <br />receives ten hours of sick time per month; according to the IRS and the Tax Reform <br />Bill of 1986, ten hours of pay is then taxable each month. Vacations fluctuate <br />but approximately two weeks extra. pay per year would be taxable - two or three <br />weeks, depending on length of employment. Hospitalization of approximately $300 <br />a month would be taxable; any benefit any employee receives is taxable upon their <br />receiving it. There is a bill to correct these measures. There is a House version <br />and a Senate version.. The House version on this section would eliminate it <br />totally. The Senate version does not. Senators Glenn and Metzenbaum are asking <br />that the House version be adopted. <br /> <br />