My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/05/2011 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
04/05/2011 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2014 4:06:51 PM
Creation date
1/13/2014 5:43:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
4/5/2011
Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City of North Olmsted <br />City Council Meeting <br /> <br />Michael Ubaldi <br />March 22, 2011 <br /> Page 9 Page 11 <br /> <br />i <br />You know, what you're going to be <br />i I <br />counsel. i <br />2 making a decision on is, you know, 2 So after that motion, first motion <br />3 substantial, reliable and probative s is made and a discussion is had, as <br />4 evidence before you to determine whether or 4 Mr. Limpertindicated, atwo-thirds vote is <br />s not there was an act or acts of misfeasance s required. It's a question of whether you <br />s and/or malfeasance. One of the things that s concur with the Mayor. If you concur, then <br />~ I think needs to be set forth is a ~ his decision stands. If less than five <br />s definition which, to give you guidance of a votes are rendered on the first question, <br />9 malfeasance and misfeasance and a place to s then it fails and then you will repeat the <br />io look for that, and I shared this with io process for the second of those two <br />>.>. counsel as well as with city council ii definitions, misfeasance or malfeasance. <br />12 You see, there is a Supreme Court lz So thank you, Mr. President, for <br />13 decision from back in the 1940s. That's 13 the opportunity to speak. And again, I'm <br />14 kind of where it came from. They kind of 14 available for questions from the council <br />i5 nailed down a definition of misfeasance and >.5 for guidance on any of the procedural <br />i6 malfeasance, and then from there it's been i6 issues that might come up. Thank you. <br />i~ cited a few other times. i~ MR. LIMPERT: That being said, <br />is But malfeasance in the case of is Mayor Kennedy, would you like to, you and <br />i9 State ex rel. Neal versus State Civil i9 your attorney, to present your case? <br />~ <br />20 Service Commission from 1947, malfeasance zo ! <br />MR. GAREAU: Mr. Limpert? <br />~ <br />21 is defined as it's the doing of an act zi MR. LIMPERT: Yes? <br />z2 which a person ought not to do at all, and 22 MR. GAREAU: Proceed with an <br />2s misfeasance is defined as the improper 2s opening statement. I think it's proper for <br />z4 doing of an act which a person might 24 Mr. Jamison to proceed with his opening <br />2s lawfully do. And I'll let you construe how z5 statement and then for Mr. Ubaldi to <br /> Page 10 Page 12 <br />i you feel those apply to the particular >. proceed. I <br />2 facts of this case. That's what your job 2 MR. LIMPERT: Oh, excuse me. <br />s is to do. s Okay. ~ <br />4 As the president indicated, it's 4 MR. GAREAU: And then following <br />5 your role to, after the presentation of all 5 the opening statements, then the Mayor can <br />6 evidence and closing statements, to make a s proceed with his first witness. <br />~ motion. I would suggest that there would ~ MR. LIMPERT: Thank you. <br />s be two motions, that there be a motion with a MR. JAMISON: Thank you, <br />s respect to misfeasance, a motion with s Mr. Gareau. Good evening, ladies and <br />io respect to malfeasance, since those were io gentlemen. As Mr. Gareau indicated, my <br />ii the two issues that were raised in the ii name is Neal Jamison. I'm here tonight on <br />iz Mayor's communication with Mr. Ubaldi. 12 behalf of Mayor Kennedy in regards to the <br />i3 That after a motion and second, that that is proposed removal of Mr. Ubaldi from the <br />is is the time at which, if you wish to debate ;.a Civil Service Commission. <br />>.s the matter publicly, you may do so. is We believe the evidence that <br />i6 It appears that the charter will 1s you're going to hear tonight -- you're <br />i~ allow for executive session on the issue of i~ going to hear from four witnesses from <br />1s removal of a public official. However, I is Mayor Kennedy's standpoint. You're going <br />i9 would probably caution against that unless ie to hear from the secretary at the Civil <br />20 Mr. Ubaldi insisted on it. It seems to 20 Service Commission, Donna Eccleston, and <br />z>. imply that it's his right that he can 21 you're also going to hear from Assistant <br />z2 request that it be a public hearing. I 22 Law Director Bryan O'Malley, also Safety <br />23 think it should probably stay a public 23 Director Chase Ritenauer, and from Mayor <br />24 hearing, but of course it's between the z4 Kennedy as to what took place January <br />2s council and the, Mr. Ubaldi and his 2s through the earlier part of March of this <br />- Mehler & Hagestrom (3) Page 9 -Page 12 <br />800.822.0650 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.