My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/05/2011 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
04/05/2011 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2014 4:06:51 PM
Creation date
1/13/2014 5:43:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
4/5/2011
Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City of North Olmsted Michael Ubaldi <br />2011 <br />March 22 <br />City Council Meeting , <br /> Page 85 Page 87 ~ <br />i A. No. i suggestions? <br />z Q. -- in terms of retirement? 2 A. No. <br />s A. No. s Q. And again, what was the reason for your <br />a MR. GAREAU: Mr. President? 4 suggesting these ideas in terms of the testing? <br />s MR. LIMPERT: Yes. 5 A. As a new mayor you always want to take a look and <br />s MR. GAREAU: He should wait until s see well, what did we do, how can we improve, <br />~ he finishes the question. ~ throw those ideas around. <br />s THE WITNESS: Okay. a The only good idea -- you know, the only bad <br />s O. After you received that information did you and s idea is the one not brought up. Civil Service <br />io members of your staff have any discussions in io had disagreed with me and I respect that. <br />ii regards to the test that would be used to ii Q. Okay. Now you were aware that there was a <br />iz determine the promotion of the next police chief? 12 meeting of the Civil Service Commission on <br />is A. I did talk to the safety and service director, is February 28th of 2011, correct? <br />i4 Chase Ritenauer. We did talk about potentially i4 A. Correct. <br />15 including, would it make sense including people 15 Q. Were you present at that meeting? <br />i6 not only from the inside here but from the i6 A. I was not. <br />i~ outside, and what type of testing would we want i~ Q. Subsequent to that meeting, however, were you <br />ie to see. is informed as to what had taken place on that <br />i9 And we wanted to see testing that could, you i9 evening at that meeting? <br />zo know, could define like leadership and 20 A. On the, on March 1st we have a directors' meeting <br />21 management. Some of those things 1 felt were 21 at 9:30. One of the directors had mentioned to <br />zz extremely important, because the position does 2z me that, that they had a meeting and that they <br />zs manage a five, you know, nearly a $5 million 2s agreed to post the police test and it was a <br />24 payroll. 24 two-to-one vote. <br />zs Q. And I was going to ask why did you feel that z5 Q. Okay. <br /> Page 86 Page 88 <br />i important, but, I mean, you just answered that. i A. And it concerned me. I had great concern. <br />2 A. It's an extremely important position because they 2 Because at this point we don't have a resignation <br />3 manage a number of people and a large payroll, a s date, so I was concerned. <br />4 large portion of the general fund. 4 Q. And were you also made aware at that meeting that <br />s Q. And did you or any members of your staff present 5 at some point the assistant law director, <br />s the suggestions or ideas to the Civil Service s Mr. O'Malley, had advised the members of the <br />~ Commission at some point in January or February ~ Commission that they should not go forward with <br />a of this year? a setting that date? <br />s A. Yes, we did. s A. Yes. <br />1o Q. Did you actually go to one of the meetings? to Q. And was that also a concern you had, that at that <br />ii A. I did go to one of the meetings. 11 point that the Commission chose not to listen to <br />12 Q. Okay. And did you express your opinions on that 12 that advice? <br />is matter? i3 A. It was a grave concern. <br />i4 A. I did. 1a Q. Okay. At that point, I think you testified that <br />is Q. Were you aware of any members of your staff also is that was the next day, Tuesday morning, March <br />i6 expressing suggestions or ideas on the i6 1st, when you became aware of that, correct, at <br />17 methodology or the structure of those tests? 17 the staff meeting? <br />1a A. The human resource director, Cheryl Farver did, is A. Yes. March 1st, yes. <br />1s and Chase Ritenauer, safety and service director. is Q. And at that point you didn't, you didn't take any <br />20 Q. Okay. And I think you heard the opening 20 actions to remove either Mr. Ubaldi or the other <br />zi statement from Mr. Ubaldi by his counsel tonight 21 Commission member who had voted to have that test <br />z2 that there was some other agenda in play here. 22 go forward, did you? <br />23 In making those suggestions, were you 23 A. No. No action took place. <br />z4 attempting to assert or circumvent the authority z4 MR. CARSON: Mr. President and ' <br />2s of the Civil Service Commission by making these zs Mr. Gareau? <br /> Mehler & Hagestrom (22) Page 85 -Page 88 <br />800.822.0650 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.