Laserfiche WebLink
s~=""' <br />City of North Olmsted <br />City Council Meeting <br />Michael Ubaldi <br />March 22, 2011 <br /> Page 153 Page 155 <br />i outside, my understanding and my request i And I just think that projects a <br />z would be that there be no outside debate, z cleaner image of our city and council as a <br />3 discussion with members of the general 3 whole, and I apologize again for being long <br />4 public, as it would only further complicate 4 winded. <br />s what is a difficult decision anyway. 5 MR. LIMPERT: Councilman Barker. <br />s And then the third duty I think s MR. BARKER: You're done? <br />~ would be not to discuss the matter amongst ~ MR. MAHONEY: I am done. <br />a ourselves. Each council member would, in a MR. BARKER: My question would be <br />s my opinion, it would be inappropriate for 9 that on the evidence that was presented <br />io me to call Mr. Orlowski and say what do you io tonight that we may not have, how long <br />ii think or what did you think. That's -- ii would it take for us to acquire those <br />iz because if there's a deliberative process, iz copies? <br />13 my opinion would be that it be here in 13 MR. GAREAU: The evidence, we'll <br />i4 council where it is open to the public so i4 make that available. The evidence that was <br />is that everyone is aware of what our thought i5 presented tonight, the exhibits can be made <br />i6 process is, if we share our comments or i6 available immediately. <br />i~ not. Some people on council might not want i~ MR. BARKER: Thank you. <br />is to offer opinion, just simply vote, but ie MR. LIMPERT: Councilman Schumann. <br />i9 others might want to voice an opinion. i9 Or do you have a different one? <br />20 But I think it would perhaps be zo MR. BARKER: No. <br />21 unwise if we were to share amongst 21 MR. SCHUMANN: I agree with <br />z2 ourselves what our thoughts and processes 22 Mr. Mahoney. I can't see how it could <br />2a are in terms of the thinking going into 2s possibly be fair to come up with a decision ~ <br />24 this. And again, those are the dangers of z4 today with all this information that we've <br />25 a continuance. But I think we're all zs just been handed. <br /> Page 154 Page 156 <br />i professionals and we can all be trusted to i MR. LIMPERT: What I would like to <br />z abide by suggestions, common sense or, you 2 ask council at this point is are you <br />a know, whatever rules we choose to adopt. 3 available Saturday morning for a brief <br />4 I think that the continuance would 4 special council meeting to conduct a vote? <br />s be in order at this point in time just 5 Is there anyone that would be not able to j <br />s speaking for myself personally. I have not s be there at that time? '~. <br />~ reviewed all of the exhibits that have been ~ MR. GAREAU: Mr. President? <br />a offered by the other side. I would like a MR. LIMPERT: Yes. ', <br />~ <br />s more time, as I indicated, to review the 9 ! <br />MR. GAREAU: But also parties' <br />io brief filed by Mr. Ubaldi and some of the io counsel as well. Let's make sure that <br />ii discussions here I would like to deliberate ii they're, if you're going to schedule a <br />iz myself, you know, just to myself and review 12 date, let's make sure that they're <br />is my notes and my, I know this is long winded i3 available as well. <br />i4 and I'm a lawyer so I apologize, but I want i4 MR. LIMPERT: Now as I receive <br />is to make myself clear. is this -- <br />i6 I think in this particular i6 MR. GAREAU: This Saturday? <br />i~ situation, because this is an important i~ MR. LIMPERT: This Saturday. We ',, <br />ie decision and it's often said I would rather is can make it 9:00 a.m. <br />i9 have more due process than less, and that's i9 Mr. Brossard? i <br />zo in particular to Mr. Ubaldi and also the 20 MR. BROSSARD: I'm the party that <br />zl administration to be fair to both sides. I 21 is having trouble congregating this <br />22 would rather have more due process by 2z Tuesday, so certainly Saturday would work <br />2a making a motion to continue so that we can 2s for me. And I would hope that it would for <br />24 further individually review our notes and z4 my colleagues as well. '~ <br />2s evidence and whatnot rather than less. 2s MR. MAHONEY: Saturday, if I <br />Mehler & Hagestrom <br />800.822.0650 <br />.,,~~~.~,... ~ .., wA w. <br /> <br />(39) Page 153 -Page 156 <br />