My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/16/1993 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1993
>
02/16/1993 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:41:05 AM
Creation date
1/9/2014 7:12:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
2/16/1993
Year
1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Public Hearing of 2/16/93 <br />Mr. McKay asked the Law Director to comment on the enforcement section of the <br />ordinance because there haci been some concern that a busi~ss could be fined on <br />the first day of a violation with each day being a separate violation. Mr. <br />Garesu said that the court would have to make this det~xmination. Also, any <br />building or zoning code penalty provision will call for each day to be a separate <br />violation. Mr. Margolit~ felt this was not fair aaxi that a warning period should <br />be written into the legislation. Mr. Careau said. he had. been speaking about the <br />cold, hard letter of the law. As a practical aspect., a warning period is always <br />given in violations of this type. The offerer is given ~ opportunity to <br />correct the problem, the inspector cc,~es out aryd re-check it, and then another <br />warning is given. If all else fails, the matter is turned over to the Assistant <br />Prosecutor; however, this rarely happens. <br />Mr. Graham said that the Chamber would like to_wark with Couuicil to try arxi come <br />up with a solutioa~ to the problem. Ile feels that most of the busi~sses in the <br />city are cooperative anel this ordinance could be a tremendous expense on the <br />majority to get to the few who do not want to cooperate. <br />Mrs. Bober, East Park. Drive, said she is a neighbor of one of the notorious <br />businesses in question. She does not want to be unreastble toward the <br />businesses, but certainly wants the city to take a firm stand. Ilex hone is <br />between seven and eight hurx~.red feet from the busies lights, a~xi she can sit in <br />her backyard and read a newspaper. The interiors of homes up to eight humdred <br />feet away are affected by these lights. Thin is very m~urea~nable, aril the <br />neighbors have been living with this for mare than ten years. They would like <br />some relief. <br />Jim Bums, 3978 Dover Center Road, former Chairperson of the Platming Commission, <br />made the observation that the ordinance has been under consicieratan since August <br />and this was the first time anybody hss spoken to it. ~ feels that the public <br />hearing process should take place before the night of the third reading of the <br />legislation. This would allow the public time to give their input. <br />In closing, Mr. Tallon said the legislation was unifornn justice for all. He <br />feels this law will be fair and equitable and in the best interests of the <br />citizens of North Olmsted. He encouraged Council to pass the legislation. <br />President Boet~ner adjourned the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. <br />ames D. Boehmer, Presi ent of Ccnmci <br />~lCeijc.~e, <br />Bar a L. Seman, C r o Counci <br />4 <br />C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.