My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/19/1996 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1996
>
11/19/1996 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:41:29 AM
Creation date
1/9/2014 9:43:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
11/19/1996
Year
1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 11/19/96 <br />.,,, Law Director Gareau: 1) Responding to Mr. Musial's question regarding the future with <br />respect to our bond rating, he believes one of the things the city has going right now is all <br />fund balances are in the positive mode. At the same time, we have reappraisal which will <br />mean increased real property tax revenue. He feels that the bond rating the city received <br />was more of a scolding than it was reality--it was their way of sending a message. All <br />indications and signs were very positive at the time of the New York meetings. The bond <br />rating did not impact the city because we obtained the insurance premium quote prior to <br />the issuance of the bond rating. Nobody likes to have their bond rating downgraded, but <br />the city fixed those things that needed to be fixed. He does not believe average citizens <br />are aware of the bond rating, but they are interested in the fact that their streets have been <br />repaired. He feels positive that in the near future the city will be upgraded to its proper <br />position. <br />2) He had indicated at the last Council meeting that we were having some problems with <br />the firefighters union regarding their refusal to accept the conciliator's decision on <br />hospitalization coverage. After this decision was rendered, the firefighters filed a <br />grievance asking that an arbitrator be appointed. On behalf of the city, he has filed an <br />unfair labor practice against the firefighters union. This was a very serious and drastic <br />move, but one that was valid. He believes the union was totally recalcitrant with respect <br />to following what they are obligated to follow under the law. Also, he believes a letter <br />received from the union indicating it would be cheaper for the city to compromise what <br />the conciliator has already awarded amounts to intimidation. Filing of the unfair labor <br />practice was warranted, and he will follow through on behalf of the city. <br />3) The Law Department is currently handling some criminal cases in the Court of Appeals <br />resulting from cases prosecuted by the City Prosecutor in Rocky River Municipal Court. <br />Finance Director Burns: 1) He has asked that Resolution 96-176 be removed from this <br />evening's agenda for further review. This legislation spells out the investment policy for <br />the city. The financial institutions and the law firms who have drawn up the investment <br />policies are currently in disagreement over a provision having to do with delivery versus <br />payment rules on repos. The legislation will probably be amended. <br />2) Resolution 96-177 has been amended. This resolution establishes the tax rates for the <br />city, and the amendment moves a half mill from the Bond Retirement Fund into the <br />General Fund. The half mill equates to about $325,000. This amendment was necessary <br />because of the effect of the lower interest rate on the bond issue that was sold today and <br />also because the bonds will be issued a month later than had been anticipated when the tax <br />budget was originally prepared. <br />3) The 1995 audit will be released on November 21. The preliminary official statement <br />went out without the 1995 audit; therefore, a portion of it will have to be rewritten once <br />the audit is released. <br />4) The bonds were sold today at an average rate of 5.49%. As has been indicated, they <br />were sold at AAA rating because they were insured. The insurance on the $43 million <br />bond issue was 16.2 basis points, which equates to a premium of approximately $113,000. <br />The $11 million bond issue in 1992 was insured at 32 basis points with a premium of <br />approximately $82,000. This issue was structured differently than anything we have done <br />4 <br />f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.