Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 8/20/96 <br />7) The city recently met with National City Bank regarding the meeting for the rating of <br />bonds which will take place in New York sometime in October. <br />In response to a request by Mr. Musial, Mr. Gareau explained the compromise that has <br />been worked out with regard to Ordinance 96-99 which will be removed from the agenda: <br />1) Mr. Gareau was asked by Council Members to look into the issue of restrictions <br />regarding use variances. Case law indicates that charters permitting the granting of use <br />variances typically indicate the process of filing and appeal and the finality of that appeal. <br />The North Olmsted Charter simply indicates that the jurisdiction of the Board of Zoning <br />Appeals is to hear appeals; it does not indicate whether or not there is a finality to it. As a <br />result of some problems a number of years ago, it was decided that a couple of types of <br />appeals would not be final until Council had an opportunity to take a look at them. Those <br />situations include requests for a ruling and special permits for commercial property, which <br />become final within 30 days unless the Council overturns them. This has occurred on <br />several occasions. Mr. Gareau has advised the Council that he does not see anything that <br />would prohibit doing the same thing with use variances. He does suggest that, when the <br />Zoning Code is revised, specific standards for an area variance be included and that use <br />variances not be final until reviewed and approved in a formal hearing by the City Council. <br />In other words, appeals would be taken from the City Council rather than the Board of <br />Zoning Appeals. After doing research on this topic, he feels this is the best way to <br />proceed. Also, it may encourage requests for a zoning change through City Council rather <br />than a use variance through the BZA. <br />Finance Director Burns: 1) President Clinton signed the minimum wage bill today. This <br />will have two impacts on the city: a. We now become subject to the minimum wage, <br />which is effective October 1; b. Employee deferred compensation plans will become <br />trustee plans as opposed to the assets being owned by the city. <br />2) On tonight's agenda is Resolution 96-153, which is the budget for 1997. Council will <br />receive a copy later in the week. It had been delayed because he had asked National City <br />Bank to generate the cash requirements for the first year debt service on the $42 million <br />bond issue. Those figures were received late Friday and he has begun assembling that <br />information and putting it into the budget. He has also asked the State Auditor's office <br />for the ability to create two funds. Although the State Auditor's office approves of the <br />ideas, the Legal Department is still reviewing the request. He will proceed with the <br />budget on the assumption that the funds will not be created for 1997. Because the budget <br />must be passed and presented to the County Auditor by September 16, he is requesting <br />that Council hold a special meeting on September 12 for third reading and passage of <br />Resolution No. 96-153. <br />3) The Federal Reserve Board met today, and the anticipated move upward in interest <br />rates did not occur. From comments made by the Chairman and because of the coming <br />election, it is now believed interest rates will remain stable through the election. This is <br />good news for North Olmsted because it will keep interest rates stable, and we are now <br />looking at approximately 5.9% for the October bond issue. <br />4 <br />