Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 9/1/98 <br />Lorain Road knows what a pleasure it is to go from one end of Lorain to another and not <br />_,~,~ hit all the stoplights you hit in the adjacent cities. Tt makes shopping a pleasure. He hopes <br />that those people on Council who have participated in keeping the balance will continue to <br />do so. <br />Mr. Gareau said Mr. Lambert's comments were a refreshing diversity of opinion. <br />Regarding Resolution 98-82, he thanked Mrs. Lepore for her comments. He feels that <br />there was a divergence of opinion between her statements and Mr. Tasse's comments, <br />which seem at least directed toward an opposition of the project generally. Regarding Mr. <br />Tasse's comments on whether there is a need for the project, he has a unique perspective <br />since he lived on Barton Road for 24 years. He often had to take around-about route to <br />get to his home because the traffic backed up on Barton Road. There is an incredible <br />volume of traffic looking for a place to go because there is no north/south corridor other <br />than Barton Road or Lear Nagle in North Ridgeville. The city has other traffic problem <br />areas, such as Clague Road, which also need to be addressed in a timely fashion. <br />Although he realizes that we are not going to change the timing of this project or get the <br />EPA to move at a faster pace, the resolution shows that we support the timetable that has <br />been established. <br />June Whitmore, 28960 Hampton Drive, a trustee on the board of the West Park-Forest <br />Ridge Civic Association, was concerned about the availability of funds for the Crocker- <br />Stearns project. She said that citizens are concerned that taxes will be raised to pay North <br />Olmsted's share of the cost. Mayor Musial said that there are no plans to raise taxes to <br />fund this project. We will provide for the funds in our strategic planning process. He <br />believes the state and federal governments will provide roughly 90% of the funds for the <br />project, the cost of which is approximately fifteen million dollars. Mrs. Whitmore <br />thought the cost to the state and federal governments was 80%, with the county paying <br />10% and North Olmsted and Westlake sharing 10%. Mr. O'Grady thanked Mrs. <br />Whitmore for her comments. He said the quotes he has seen put the project at <br />approximately ten million dollars, making our share less than one million dollars. He has <br />heard the figure of approximately eight hundred thousand dollars. Costs will probably go <br />up if there axe delays. The City of North Olmsted has the intent based on the will of the <br />voters to fully participate and provide our share. <br />Mr. Gareau said he does not believe there has been an instance in the past where a tax has <br />been levied to pay for a capital improvement. Mrs. Saringer said she could not remember <br />such a situation. Law Director Gareau said we have had a history in our city going back <br />to the 1970's of funding capital improvement projects through Councilmanic bond action. <br />We have not typically gone before the voters for bond issues. <br />Mr. Miller asked the Law Director whether the last "Whereas" clause in the ordinance <br />would commit a future Council body to something we perhaps shouldn't be taking <br />responsibility for at this time. The clause reads: "Whereas, the North Olmsted City <br />Council, with the support of the Mayor and his administration, will be prepared to honor <br />`~`"` its financial commitment to the construction of Crocker-Stearns extension" Law Director <br />7 <br />_ ._ r,~~..~„ <br />