Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 10/19/1999 <br />Tom Schrader, attorney for Q-Panel who helped draft the agreement, noted that in <br />Section VIII it says that approval is required. What that is clarifying is what Mr. Gareau <br />was talking about. That is, this approval of a letter of intent by this Council has nothing <br />to do with the actual construction of the road or the location of the road. What Section <br />VIII says is that these two cities are entering into this agreement. But it says it does not <br />guarantee the acceptance of the proposed dedicated roadway. It says it has to be <br />constructed in accordance with the appropriate plans of the various cities and has to <br />subsequently be approved by the cities and their respective Council. So those protections <br />are built into this agreement as opposed to somehow this city right now entering into an <br />agreement that somehow is a concern to Council that they are binding themselves into <br />something right now and binding the adjacent property owner. That is not going to <br />happen. There will still be hearings and there will still be an opportunity for engineering <br />to make sure that everything conforms. Law Director Gareau had made suggestions as to <br />what he wished to have in the agreement for additional protections and benefits for North <br />Olmsted, and everything he requested was added. Law Director Gareau noted that the <br />object was to make sure that the authority of the City Council of North Olmsted was not <br />compromised. <br />Mr. Nashar asked when Q-Panel intended to address the issue with the neighboring <br />business. Mr. Schrader commented that, as a matter of common courtesy, he would say <br />that it should have been addressed. There are possible solutions if any difficulties are <br />encountered. They will talk to Aetna Door to make sure the company understands <br />exactly what is going on. Last night this letter of intent was approved by the City <br />Council of North Ridgeville. If North Olmsted's City Council approves it, then they can <br />go forward with plans-not the construction of the road. Obviously, Aetna door is part <br />of that. <br />Mayor Hill commented that, simply put, this agreement means to North Ridgeville that <br />they will be responsible for the maintenance and repair of the road if it is built. <br />Mr. Miller asked if Aetna Door had been notified of the Planning Commission meeting <br />and if they were present. Law Director Gareau said they would have had to have been. <br />The city is required to notify adjacent property owners when a proposal comes before <br />Planning Commission. However, he does not believe Aetna Door was present at the <br />meeting. Mr. Zagrans said he had no personal knowledge of whether Aetna Door was <br />notified but feels they should have been to conform to North Olmsted laws. Tom Hreha, <br />member of the Planning Commission, came forward to say that Aetna Door was not <br />present at the meeting but he presumes they were notified. Mr. Miller asked if North <br />Ridgeville was compensating Q-Panel in some way to allow the road to go on their <br />property. Mr. Zagrans said that, if this agreement goes through this evening and thereby <br />enabling the parties to enter into a settlement agreement tomorrow, there will be no <br />compensation by North Ridgeville to Q-Panel. Mr. Miller said he assumed their benefit <br />is that their property value will be increased because there is a roadway accessing it other <br />than Lorain Road. Mr. Zagrans said that was a fair presumption. Mr. Miller noted that <br />historically, when the value is increased on Lorain Road frontage, the tax benefits to the <br />city increase. He is wondering how North Olmsted is going to be compensated for the <br />9 <br />~,.. ~...., <~ <,.,.,.~ . ,r,,, , , ,.. , <br />