Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 4/20/99 <br />responsible for success or failure. He feels strongly that such action falls within the <br />~'~ prerogative of the Mayor. Also, Section 167.03 of Chapter 167 of our Codified <br />Ordinances entitled "Department of Personnel & Administrative Services" states in part <br />that: "The salary range for the director of the Department of Personnel & Administrative <br />Services as well as other employees of the department shall be determined by Council. <br />The specific salary for the director shall be determined by the Mayor." He understands <br />that Council has the final say by not appropriating the monies for a salary increase <br />beyond a general increase given to all employees even if it is within the range for that <br />position. However, if Council makes that decision, he feels that Council has an <br />obligation to set forth the reasons as to why that person is not entitled to such awithin- <br />range salary increase-perhaps in an executive session. Further, there have been <br />statements made that the Recreation Center needs many dollars to fund the various <br />required repairs, which he concurs with. The proposed within-range increase of the <br />Personnel Director over the general 3% was on the order of an adjusted $5,955. By <br />denying the raise, Council has saved on the order of $5,955. He fails to see what impact <br />this savings will have on major Recreation Center needs. There is a situation wherein <br />Council approved awithin-pay range salary increase over and above the 3% given to all <br />the employees. He had requested the EDP Commissioner's salary be increased to <br />$49,500 from $42,405. Some Council members wanted his salary increase cut back to <br />the 3% general increase. After discussions regarding the realities of the computer <br />technology salary environment, Council cut the proposed salary increase by $4, 500 <br />thereby reducing his salary to $45,000. However, an increase of 3% would put the <br />commissioner at $43,677. He considers the extra $1,323 as a within-range salary <br />increase over the general 3% increase. On our way to becoming the premier city in Ohio, <br />it is imperative that we concentrate on three very important pillars of strength: fire <br />protection, police protection and service. He considers these three pillars of strength to be <br />second to none in the State of Ohio. At one of the Finance Committee appropriations <br />meetings, he and a Councilperson engaged in a conversation regarding the personnel <br />status of the Police and Fire Departments. When the Councilperson asked him about the <br />rumors of personnel cuts in these departments, he indicated that his policy is not to <br />reduce the professional staff of the safety forces. We do have an obligation to assess and <br />evaluate support staff positions when they retire, or otherwise leave their position. We do <br />not live in a perfect world. If we did, we would have all the monies we need to take care <br />of current needs, which runs in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. In our real world, <br />we must prioritize our needs and obtain maximum benefit from our available resources, <br />without jeopardizing the health, safety and welfare regarding the residents of, the workers <br />in and the visitors to the City of North Olmsted. During the course of our internal budget <br />appropriations process, the budget was adjusted many times to fall within our available <br />resources. The budget process is an on-going dynamic process. All of us have an <br />obligation to improve efficiency or otherwise reduce expenses. <br /> <br />12 <br />